Methodological Pluralism, Armchair Introspection, and DES as the Epistemic Tribunal

摘要: Seek[ing] to minimize many of the sources error and distortion in first-person judgments ...doesn’t justify according beeper reports a place such high epistemic privilege that these should serve as sort tribunal, before which present tense judgments, those made response more targeted questions, can be tried. ... Insufficient reasons have been offered think other are overall inferior [beeper reports]. Nor is it even clear court Hurlburt convenes would yield harsh verdicts he suggests, were furnished with appropriate rules evidence. (Siewert, ref *** )