Evaluation of fitting models for prostate tissue characterization using extended-range b-factor diffusion-weighted imaging

作者: Fredrik Langkilde , Thiele Kobus , Andriy Fedorov , Ruth Dunne , Clare Tempany

DOI: 10.1002/MRM.26831

关键词: MathematicsEffective diffusion coefficientKurtosisDiffusion MRIExponential functionNuclear magnetic resonanceNuclear medicineRange (statistics)Akaike information criterionDiffusion (business)Gamma distribution

摘要: Purpose To compare the fitting and tissue discrimination performance of biexponential, kurtosis, stretched exponential, gamma distribution models for high b-factor diffusion-weighted images in prostate cancer. Methods Diffusion-weighted with 15 b-factors ranging from b = 0 to 3500 s/mm2 were obtained 62 cancer patients. Pixel-wise signal decay fits each model evaluated Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). Parameter values determined within normal index lesion. Their potential differentiate cancerous was investigated through receiver operating characteristic analysis comparison Gleason score. Results The biexponential slow diffusion fraction fslow , apparent kurtosis coefficient ADCK excess factor K differ significantly among peripheral zone (PZ), transition (TZ), tumor PZ, TZ. Biexponential result lowest AIC, indicating a superior fit. Maximum areas under curve (AUCs) all ranged 0.93 0.96 PZ 0.95 0.97 Similar AUCs also (ADC) monoexponential fit sub-range up 1250 . For exponential models, single parameters yield highest AUCs, whereas linear combinations produce AUCs. Parameters AUC show trend differentiating low score, no such ability. Conclusion All including lower-b sub-range, achieve similar tissue. model, which is favored statistically, appears provide insight into disease-related microstructural changes. Magn Reson Med 79:2346-2358, 2018. © 2017 International Society Magnetic Resonance Medicine.

参考文章(35)
Roger M. Bourne, Eleftheria Panagiotaki, Andre Bongers, Paul Sved, Geoffrey Watson, Daniel C. Alexander, Information theoretic ranking of four models of diffusion attenuation in fresh and fixed prostate tissue ex vivo. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. ,vol. 72, pp. 1418- 1426 ,(2014) , 10.1002/MRM.25032
Jeffrey C Weinreb, Jelle O Barentsz, Peter L Choyke, Francois Cornud, Masoom A Haider, Katarzyna J Macura, Daniel Margolis, Mitchell D Schnall, Faina Shtern, Clare M Tempany, Harriet C Thoeny, Sadna Verma, None, PI-RADS Prostate Imaging – Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2 European Urology. ,vol. 69, pp. 16- 40 ,(2016) , 10.1016/J.EURURO.2015.08.052
He Wang, Yong Zhang, Xiaohang Liu, Liangping Zhou, Weijun Peng, Comparison of stretched‐Exponential and monoexponential model diffusion‐Weighted imaging in prostate cancer and normal tissues Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. ,vol. 42, pp. 1078- 1085 ,(2015) , 10.1002/JMRI.24872
Yu Ueda, Satoru Takahashi, Naoki Ohno, Katsusuke Kyotani, Hideaki Kawamitu, Tosiaki Miyati, Nobukazu Aoyama, Yoshiko Ueno, Kazuhiro Kitajima, Fumi Kawakami, Tomoyuki Okuaki, Ryuko Tsukamoto, Emmy Yanagita, Kazuro Sugimura, Triexponential function analysis of diffusion-weighted MRI for diagnosing prostate cancer. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. ,vol. 43, pp. 138- 148 ,(2016) , 10.1002/JMRI.24974
Torsten Mattfeldt, Paul Grahovac, Sebastian Lück, MULTICLASS PATTERN RECOGNITION OF THE GLEASON SCORE OF PROSTATIC CARCINOMAS USING METHODS OF SPATIAL STATISTICS Image Analysis & Stereology. ,vol. 32, pp. 155- 165 ,(2013) , 10.5566/IAS.V32.P155-165
Thomas L. Chenevert, Craig J. Galbán, Marko K. Ivancevic, Susan E. Rohrer, Frank J. Londy, Thomas C. Kwee, Charles R. Meyer, Timothy D. Johnson, Alnawaz Rehemtulla, Brian D. Ross, Diffusion coefficient measurement using a temperature‐controlled fluid for quality control in multicenter studies Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. ,vol. 34, pp. 983- 987 ,(2011) , 10.1002/JMRI.22363
Michael Quentin, Dirk Blondin, Janina Klasen, Rotem Shlomo Lanzman, Falk-Roland Miese, Christian Arsov, Peter Albers, Gerald Antoch, Hans-Jörg Wittsack, Comparison of different mathematical models of diffusion-weighted prostate MR imaging. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. ,vol. 30, pp. 1468- 1474 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.MRI.2012.04.025
Eleftheria Panagiotaki, Rachel W. Chan, Nikolaos Dikaios, Hashim U. Ahmed, James O’Callaghan, Alex Freeman, David Atkinson, Shonit Punwani, David J. Hawkes, Daniel C. Alexander, Microstructural Characterization of Normal and Malignant Human Prostate Tissue With Vascular, Extracellular, and Restricted Diffusion for Cytometry in Tumours Magnetic Resonance Imaging Investigative Radiology. ,vol. 50, pp. 218- 227 ,(2015) , 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000115
T. Durmus, A. Baur, B. Hamm, Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of prostate cancer. Rofo-fortschritte Auf Dem Gebiet Der Rontgenstrahlen Und Der Bildgebenden Verfahren. ,vol. 186, pp. 238- 246 ,(2014) , 10.1055/S-0034-1365937
Xiaohang Liu, Liangping Zhou, Weijun Peng, Chaofu Wang, He Wang, Differentiation of central gland prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia using monoexponential and biexponential diffusion-weighted imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging. ,vol. 31, pp. 1318- 1324 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.MRI.2013.03.002