On the Adaptive Control of the False Discovery Rate in Multiple Testing With Independent Statistics

作者: Yoav Benjamini , Yosef Hochberg

DOI: 10.3102/10769986025001060

关键词: Computerized adaptive testingMultiple comparisons problemStatistical hypothesis testingFalse coverage rateStatisticsFalse discovery ratePer-comparison error rateAdaptive controlMathematicsNull hypothesisSocial Sciences (miscellaneous)Education

摘要: A new approach to problems of multiple significance testing was presented in Benjamini and Hochberg (1995), which calls for controlling the expected ratio of the number of erroneous rejections to the number of rejections–the False Discovery Rate (FDR). The procedure given there was shown to control the FDR for independent test statistics. When some of the hypotheses are in fact false, that procedure is too conservative. We present here an adaptive procedure, where the number of true null hypotheses is estimated first as in Hochberg and Benjamini (1990), and this estimate is used in the procedure of Benjamini and Hochberg (1995). The result is still a simple stepwise procedure, to which we also give a graphical companion. The new procedure is used in several examples drawn from educational and behavioral studies, addressing problems in multi-center studies, subset analysis and meta-analysis. The examples vary in the number of hypotheses tested, and the implication of the new procedure on the conclusions. In a large simulation study of independent test statistics the adaptive procedure is shown to control the FDR and have substantially better power than the previously suggested FDR controlling method, which by itself is more powerful than the traditional family wise error-rate controlling methods. In cases where most of the tested hypotheses are far from being true there is hardly any penalty due to the simultaneous testing of many hypotheses.

参考文章(27)
Gerhard Hommel, Gudrun Bernhard, Multiple Hypotheses Testing Physica-Verlag HD. pp. 211- 235 ,(1993) , 10.1007/978-3-642-99766-2_10
Paul Seeger, A Note on a Method for the Analysis of Significances en masse Technometrics. ,vol. 10, pp. 586- 593 ,(1968) , 10.1080/00401706.1968.10490605
Y. Hochberg, A. C. Tamhane, Multiple Comparison Procedures ,(1987)
Y. Benjamini, Y. Hochberg, P. B. Stark, Confidence Intervals with More Power to Determine the Sign: Two Ends Constrain the Means Journal of the American Statistical Association. ,vol. 93, pp. 309- 317 ,(1998) , 10.1080/01621459.1998.10474112
Pranab K Sen, Some remarks on Simes-type multiple tests of significance Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference. ,vol. 82, pp. 139- 145 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0378-3758(99)00037-3
Valerie S. L. Williams, Lyle V. Jones, John W. Tukey, Controlling Error in Multiple Comparisons, with Examples from State-to-State Differences in Educational Achievement. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. ,vol. 24, pp. 42- 69 ,(1999) , 10.2307/1165261
James F. Troendle, Stepwise normal theory multiple test procedures controlling the false discovery rate Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference. ,vol. 84, pp. 139- 158 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0378-3758(99)00145-7