Calibration of helical tomotherapy machine using EPR/alanine dosimetry

作者: Nicolas Perichon , Tristan Garcia , Pascal François , Valérie Lourenço , Caroline Lesven

DOI: 10.1118/1.3553407

关键词: Computational physicsTomotherapyDosimeterImaging phantomNuclear magnetic resonanceAbsorbed dosePhysicsReference beamCalibrationBeam (structure)Dosimetry

摘要: Purpose: Current codes of practice for clinical reference dosimetry high-energy photon beams in conventional radiotherapy recommend using a 10 × cm 2 square field, with the detector at depth water and 100 source to surface distance (SSD) (AAPM TG-51) or source-to-axis (SAD) (IAEA TRS-398). However, maximum field size helical tomotherapy (HT) machine is 40 5 defined 85 SAD. These nonstandard conditions prevent direct implementation these protocols. The purpose this study twofold: To check absorbed dose rate calibration unit as well accuracy treatment planning system (TPS) calculations specific test case. Method: Both topics are based on use electron paramagnetic resonance(EPR) alanine transfer dosimeter between Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel (LNHB) C 60 o- γ -ray beam Institut Curie’s HT beam. Irradiations performed LNHB allowed setting up method, which was then implemented tested 6 MV linac x-ray beam, resulting deviation 1.6% (at 1% standard uncertainty) relative value determined IAEA TRS-398 protocol. Results: estimation shows difference 2% stated by manufacturer uncertainty. A 4% measured calculation from TPS found. latter originated an inadequate representation phantom CT-scan values and, consequently, mass densities within phantom. This has been explained density given used were not true ones. Once corrected Monte Carlo N-Particle simulations validate process, found be around (with uncertainty doses 1.5% EPR measurements). Conclusion: Beam results good agreement Moreover, determination method set uncertainty).

参考文章(19)
C J Langer, Concurrent chemoradiation using paclitaxel and carboplatin in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Seminars in Radiation Oncology. ,vol. 9, pp. 108- 116 ,(1999)
Pascal Francois, Alejandro Mazal, Static and rotational output variation of a tomotherapy unit. Medical Physics. ,vol. 36, pp. 816- 820 ,(2009) , 10.1118/1.3075898
Robert Jeraj, Thomas R. Mackie, John Balog, Gustavo Olivera, Dave Pearson, Jeff Kapatoes, Ken Ruchala, Paul Reckwerdt, Radiation characteristics of helical tomotherapy. Medical Physics. ,vol. 31, pp. 396- 404 ,(2004) , 10.1118/1.1639148
John Balog, Gustavo Olivera, Jeff Kapatoes, Clinical helical tomotherapy commissioning dosimetry. Medical Physics. ,vol. 30, pp. 3097- 3106 ,(2003) , 10.1118/1.1625444
D.F. Regulla, U. Deffner, Dosimetry by ESR spectroscopy of alanine The International Journal of Applied Radiation and Isotopes. ,vol. 33, pp. 1101- 1114 ,(1982) , 10.1016/0020-708X(82)90238-1
S. D. Thomas, M. Mackenzie, D. W. O. Rogers, B. G. Fallone, A Monte Carlo derived TG‐51 equivalent calibration for helical tomotherapy Medical Physics. ,vol. 32, pp. 1346- 1353 ,(2005) , 10.1118/1.1897084
T. Garcia, M. Lin, I. Pasquié, V. Lourenço, A methodology for choosing parameters for ESR readout of alanine dosimeters for radiotherapy Radiation Physics and Chemistry. ,vol. 78, pp. 782- 790 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.RADPHYSCHEM.2009.05.020
P.H.G. Sharpe, K. Rajendran, J.P. Sephton, Progress towards an alanine/ESR therapy level reference dosimetry service at NPL. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. ,vol. 47, pp. 1171- 1175 ,(1996) , 10.1016/S0969-8043(96)00174-1
J.O. Deasy, J.F. Fowler, J.L. Roti Roti, D.A. Low, Dose-rate effects in intensity modulated radiation therapy International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. ,vol. 51, pp. 400- 401 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0360-3016(01)02561-5
F. Ruckerbauer, M. Sprunck, D.F. Regulla, Numerical signal treatment for optimized alanine/ESR dosimetry in the therapy-level dose range Applied Radiation and Isotopes. ,vol. 47, pp. 1263- 1268 ,(1996) , 10.1016/S0969-8043(96)00161-3