Variance Components for Test-Day Milk, Fat, and Protein Yield, and Somatic Cell Score for Analyzing Management Information

作者: M. Caccamo , R.F. Veerkamp , G. de Jong , M.H. Pool , R. Petriglieri

DOI: 10.3168/JDS.2007-0805

关键词: HerdStatisticsLactationAnalysis of varianceIce calvingVeterinary medicineAdditive genetic effectsMathematicsDairy cattleVariance (accounting)Explained variation

摘要: Test-day (TD) models are used in most countries to perform national genetic evaluations for dairy cattle. The TD estimate lactation curves and their changes as well variation populations. Although potentially useful, little attention has been given the application of management purposes. potential model use depends on its ability describe within- or between-herd that can be linked specific practices. aim this study was variance components milk yield, component yields, somatic cell score (SCS) cows Ragusa Vicenza areas Italy, such relevant sources identified development parameters. available data set contained 1,080,637 records 42,817 471 herds. Variance were estimated with a multilactation, random-regression, animal by using software adopted NRS Dutch evaluation. comprised 5 fixed effects [region x parity days (DIM), year calving season DIM, age at calving, interval stage pregnancy, test calendar week test] random herd date, regressions curve (HCUR), additive effect, permanent environmental effect fourth-order Legendre polynomials. HCUR variances protein yields highest around time peak yield (DIM 50 150), whereas fat relatively constant throughout first decreased following 40 90 DIM lactations 2 3. For SCS, small compared genetic, environmental, residual variances. all traits except explained date much smaller than variance, which indicates parameters should focus during components. within-herd greater suggesting explaining cow level. present showed clear evidence benefits regression decisions.

参考文章(17)
David Lofsvold, Mark Kirkpatrick, Michael Bulmer, Analysis of the inheritance, selection and evolution of growth trajectories. Genetics. ,vol. 124, pp. 979- 993 ,(1990) , 10.1093/GENETICS/124.4.979
J. Jamrozik, L.R. Schaeffer, J.C.M. Dekkers, Genetic Evaluation of Dairy Cattle Using Test Day Yields and Random Regression Model Journal of Dairy Science. ,vol. 80, pp. 1217- 1226 ,(1997) , 10.3168/JDS.S0022-0302(97)76050-8
P. Mayeres, J. Stoll, J. Bormann, R. Reents, N. Gengler, Prediction of daily milk, fat, and protein production by a random regression test-day model. Journal of Dairy Science. ,vol. 87, pp. 1925- 1933 ,(2004) , 10.3168/JDS.S0022-0302(04)73351-2
R. Reents, J.C.M. Dekkers, L.R. Schaeffer, Genetic Evaluation for Somatic Cell Score with a Test Day Model for Multiple Lactations Journal of Dairy Science. ,vol. 78, pp. 2858- 2870 ,(1995) , 10.3168/JDS.S0022-0302(95)76916-8
Ewa Ptak, L.R. Schaeffer, Use of test day yields for genetic evaluation of dairy sires and cows Livestock Production Science. ,vol. 34, pp. 23- 34 ,(1993) , 10.1016/0301-6226(93)90033-E
B Rekik, A.Ben Gara, Factors affecting the occurrence of atypical lactations for Holstein–Friesian cows Livestock Production Science. ,vol. 87, pp. 245- 250 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.LIVPRODSCI.2003.09.023
L.R. Schaeffer, J. Jamrozik, G.J. Kistemaker, J. Van Doormaal, Experience with a Test-Day Model Journal of Dairy Science. ,vol. 83, pp. 1135- 1144 ,(2000) , 10.3168/JDS.S0022-0302(00)74979-4
B. Horan, P. Dillon, D.P. Berry, P. O'Connor, M. Rath, The effect of strain of Holstein–Friesian, feeding system and parity on lactation curves characteristics of spring-calving dairy cows Livestock Production Science. ,vol. 95, pp. 231- 241 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.LIVPRODSCI.2004.12.021
M Tekerli, Z Akinci, I Dogan, A Akcan, None, Factors Affecting the Shape of Lactation Curves of Holstein Cows from the Balikesir Province of Turkey Journal of Dairy Science. ,vol. 83, pp. 1381- 1386 ,(2000) , 10.3168/JDS.S0022-0302(00)75006-5