General resilience: Taxonomy and strategies

摘要: Because resilience thinking has increasingly been used in various disciplines and domains extended with a broader scope of concepts, it is difficult to find unified encompassing definition by which can be accurately referred to. Furthermore, elucidate synthesize all theories conceptual frameworks that have put forward will require volumes written work. We therefore argue this paper research works pursuing the common strategies system language help describe specific contexts applied. propose here taxonomy for general consists four orthogonal dimensions, namely, type shock or perturbation, target system, phase concern, recovery. also observed despite its domain-dependency, there exist cut across multiple domains, specifically, redundancy, diversity adaptability. There another, however, we detail equally compelling, i.e., strategy break rigid stability leads greater fragility more severe collapse prolonged period severity. Specifically, deliberately inject induce regularly small “controlled” shocks into regulate build-up complexity rigidity among components their connections. Doing so not only prolong but shorten severity wake shock.