Transdisciplinary co-design of scientific research agendas: 40 research questions for socially relevant climate engineering research

作者: Masahiro Sugiyama , Shinichiro Asayama , Takanobu Kosugi , Atsushi Ishii , Seita Emori

DOI: 10.1007/S11625-016-0376-2

关键词: Engineering ethicsFoundation (evidence)NegotiationSustainable developmentResearch questionsClimate engineeringLandscape ecologySociologyClimate changePublic engagement

摘要: Interest in climate engineering research has grown rapidly owing to the slow progress of international negotiations. As some scientists are proposing expand and conduct field tests, there is an emerging debate about whether how it should proceed. It widely accepted both by supporters critics that public engagement from early stage necessary. Nonetheless, most, if not all, existing projects were designed predominantly experts. To produce socially relevant knowledge, hence, pursue transdisciplinary integrates interdisciplinary engagement, desirable for decide together with on what kind be done. In this paper, we as Japanese stakeholders collaboratively identify 40 questions a particular emphasis stratospheric aerosol injection, using method encourage science–policy collaboration. While acknowledge methodological problems difficulty obtaining active participation stakeholders, list identified covers broad perspectives diverse interests, may provide important foundation future engineering. Given dynamic nature change policy responses, agendas periodically iteratively reviewed updated through processes.

参考文章(65)
David Keith, A Case for Climate Engineering ,(2013)
Joshua B. Horton, Geoengineering and the Myth of Unilateralism: Pressures and Prospects for International Cooperation Stanford Journal of Law, Science & Policy (SJLSP). ,vol. 4, pp. 56- ,(2011)
Roland W. Scholz, Gerald Steiner, The real type and ideal type of transdisciplinary processes: part I—theoretical foundations Sustainability Science. ,vol. 10, pp. 527- 544 ,(2015) , 10.1007/S11625-015-0326-4
Rose C. Cairns, Climate geoengineering: issues of path-dependence and socio-technical lock-in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. ,vol. 5, pp. 649- 661 ,(2014) , 10.1002/WCC.296
M. Hulme, Can science fix climate change Polity Press. ,(2014)
John G Shepherd, None, Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty The Royal Society. ,(2009)
Olivier Boucher, Piers M. Forster, Nicolas Gruber, Minh Ha-Duong, Mark G. Lawrence, Timothy M. Lenton, Achim Maas, Naomi E. Vaughan, Rethinking climate engineering categorization in the context of climate change mitigation and adaptation Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. ,vol. 5, pp. 23- 35 ,(2014) , 10.1002/WCC.261
Ben Kravitz, Ken Caldeira, Olivier Boucher, Alan Robock, Philip J Rasch, Kari Alterskjaer, Diana Bou Karam, Jason NS Cole, Charles L Curry, James M Haywood, Peter J Irvine, Duoying Ji, Andy Jones, Jón Egill Kristjánsson, Daniel J Lunt, John C Moore, Ulrike Niemeier, Hauke Schmidt, Michael Schulz, Balwinder Singh, Simone Tilmes, Shingo Watanabe, Shuting Yang, Jin‐Ho Yoon, None, Climate model response from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. ,vol. 118, pp. 8320- 8332 ,(2013) , 10.1002/JGRD.50646