Risk: Traditional Finance versus Behavioral Finance

作者: Victor Ricciardi

DOI: 10.1002/9780470404324.HOF003002

关键词: Economic capitalBehavioral economicsActuarial scienceFinancial risk managementExperimental financeFinancial modelingFinancial riskFinanceSocial studies of financeEconomicsCapital asset pricing model

摘要: The notion of risk encompasses a wide range meanings across different disciplines, notably the social sciences and business administration fields. Within academic finance, focal point traditional (or standard) finance researchers involves objective nature risk. This viewpoint quantitative measure (e.g., beta, standard deviation) which is based on macro-level assessment incorporating all participants in financial markets. A fundamental assumption linear (positive) relationship between return. In contrast, behavioral academics provide an extensive examination combination both subjective factors. perspective incorporates qualitative aspect influence cognitive issues emotional factors) that highly significant if micro level it acknowledged decision maker essential defining understanding An emerging topic interest exploration by camp has been inverse (negative) perceived expected return (perceived gain). Ultimately, investment situational, multidimensional judgment process dependent specific characteristics product or service. Keywords: risk; uncertainty; objective risk; subjective risk; risk perception; perceived risk; risk-taking behavior; behavioral accounting; traditional finance; standard finance; behavioral finance; experimental economics; psychology; financial psychology; social sciences; modern portfolio theory; standard deviation; variance; semivariance; beta; capital asset pricing model

参考文章(164)
Bernd Rohrmann, Ortwin Renn, Risk Perception Research Springer, Boston, MA. pp. 11- 53 ,(2000) , 10.1007/978-1-4757-4891-8_1
Kent D. Daniel, David A. Hirshleifer, Siew Hong Teoh, Investor Psychology in Capital Markets: Evidence and Policy Implications Social Science Research Network. ,(2001) , 10.2139/SSRN.278848
Stephen Diacon, Investment risk perceptions: Do consumers and advisers agree? International Journal of Bank Marketing. ,vol. 22, pp. 180- 199 ,(2004) , 10.1108/02652320410530304
Lola L. Lopes, Between Hope and Fear: The Psychology of Risk Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. ,vol. 20, pp. 255- 295 ,(1987) , 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60416-5
Robert A. Olsen, George H. Troughton, Are Risk Premium Anomalies Caused by Ambiguity Financial Analysts Journal. ,vol. 56, pp. 24- 31 ,(2000) , 10.2469/FAJ.V56.N2.2341
Josef Lakonishok, Alan C. Shapiro, Systematic risk, total risk and size as determinants of stock market returns Journal of Banking & Finance. ,vol. 10, pp. 115- 132 ,(1986) , 10.1016/0378-4266(86)90023-3
Clayton P. Alderfer, Harold Bierman, Jr., Choices with Risk: Beyond the Mean and Variance The Journal of Business. ,vol. 43, pp. 341- 353 ,(1970) , 10.1086/295286
Jan Mossin, Equilibrium in a Capital Asset Market Econometrica. ,vol. 34, pp. 768- ,(1966) , 10.2307/1910098