Simulation vs. Definition: Differing Approaches to Setting Probabilities for Agent Behaviour

作者: Fraser Morgan , Philip Brown , Adam Daigneault

DOI: 10.3390/LAND4040914

关键词: Affect (psychology)Catchment scaleDisciplineEnvironmental policyOrder (exchange)EconometricsEconomicsRural landScale (chemistry)Operations management

摘要: While geographers and economists regularly work together on the development of land-use land-cover change models, research how differences in their modelling approaches affects results is rare. Answering calls for more coordination between two disciplines order to build models that better represent real world, we (two a geographer) developed an economically grounded, spatially explicit, agent-based model explore effects environmental policy rural land use New Zealand. This inter-disciplinary collaboration raised number approach. One key difference, focus this paper, way which processes shape behaviour agents are integrated within model. Using nationally representative survey, compare disciplinary-aligned setting farmer agent’s likelihood conversion. anticipated would significantly affect outcomes, at catchment scale they produced similar trends results. However, further analysis sub-catchment suggests approach conversion does matter. outlined here will not fully resolve disciplinary differences, do outline need account heterogeneity predicted agent behaviours both disciplines.

参考文章(73)
F.H. Sklar, R. Costanza, The development of dynamic spatial models for landscape ecology: a review and prognosis Ecological studies. ,vol. 82, pp. 239- 288 ,(1991)
Oshadhi Samarasinghe, Suzie Greenhalgh, Adam J. Daigneault, Economic Impacts of GHG and Nutrient Reduction Policies in New Zealand: A Tale of Two Catchments 2012 Conference (56th), February 7-10, 2012, Freemantle, Australia. ,(2012) , 10.22004/AG.ECON.124284
Anna M. Hersperger, Maria-Pia Gennaio, Peter H. Verburg, Matthias Bürgi, Linking Land Change with Driving Forces and Actors: Four Conceptual Models Ecology and Society. ,vol. 15, pp. 1- 17 ,(2010) , 10.5751/ES-03562-150401
Jackson Kytle, Albert Bandura, Social learning theory Canadian Journal of Sociology-cahiers Canadiens De Sociologie. ,vol. 2, pp. 321- ,(1977) , 10.2307/2065952
Nicholas Mark Gotts, J. Gareth Polhill, When and How to Imitate Your Neighbours: Lessons from and for FEARLUS Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation. ,vol. 12, pp. 1- 2 ,(2009)
Thomas Heckelei, Wolfgang Britz, Yinan Zhang, Positive Mathematical Programming Approaches - Recent Developments in Literature and Applied Modelling Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal. ,vol. 1, pp. 109- 124 ,(2012) , 10.13128/BAE-10567
Fraser J. Morgan, Adam J. Daigneault, Estimating Impacts of Climate Change Policy on Land Use: An Agent-Based Modelling Approach PLOS ONE. ,vol. 10, pp. e0127317- 20 ,(2015) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0127317
G. Deffuant, S. Huet, G. Weisbuch, J. Henriot, M. A. Janssen, G. Amon, J. P. Bousset, Agent-based simulation of organic farming conversion in Allier département. Complexity and ecosystem management: the theory and practice of multi-agent systems. pp. 158- 187 ,(2002)
Louis Lebel, John M. Anderies, Bruce Campbell, Carl Folke, Steve Hatfield-Dodds, Terry P. Hughes, James Wilson, Governance and the Capacity to Manage Resilience in Regional Social-Ecological Systems Ecology and Society. ,vol. 11, pp. 19- ,(2006) , 10.5751/ES-01606-110119