作者: Peter B. Edwards , Richard Hindmarsh , Holly Mercer , Meghan Bond , Angela Rowland
DOI: 10.16997/JDD.65
关键词: Climate change 、 Legitimacy 、 Conversation 、 Process management 、 Computer science 、 Schema (psychology) 、 Policy studies 、 Ethos 、 Three stage 、 Socioeconomics
摘要: Formulating deliberative evaluation tools indicates an important new field for the practitioner of design due to increasing adoption policy mechanisms by governmental and non-governmental organisations. Evaluation aid design, effectiveness integrity legitimacy these mechanisms. Relatively few studies though have reflected on how conduct evaluation. Here, we report our formulation a three-stage approach evaluation, which applied in independent Courageous Conversation Climate Change Transforming Energy (March 2007), designed Ethos Foundation, Queensland, Australia. Overall, found schema successful identifying both positives negatives what could be applauded needed revision. More broadly, advance that it offers useful practitioners develop further, especially getting balance right evaluating process outputs, added inputs reflection advances.