A Three-Stage Evaluation of a Deliberative Event on Climate Change and Transforming Energy

作者: Peter B. Edwards , Richard Hindmarsh , Holly Mercer , Meghan Bond , Angela Rowland

DOI: 10.16997/JDD.65

关键词: Climate changeLegitimacyConversationProcess managementComputer scienceSchema (psychology)Policy studiesEthosThree stageSocioeconomics

摘要: Formulating deliberative evaluation tools indicates an important new field for the practitioner of design due to increasing adoption policy mechanisms by governmental and non-governmental organisations. Evaluation aid design, effectiveness integrity legitimacy these mechanisms. Relatively few studies though have reflected on how conduct evaluation. Here, we report our formulation a three-stage approach evaluation, which applied in independent Courageous Conversation Climate Change Transforming Energy (March 2007), designed Ethos Foundation, Queensland, Australia. Overall, found schema successful identifying both positives negatives what could be applauded needed revision. More broadly, advance that it offers useful practitioners develop further, especially getting balance right evaluating process outputs, added inputs reflection advances.

参考文章(31)
John S. Dryzek, Deliberative democracy and beyond ,(2000)
Janette Hartz-Karp, Lyn Carson, Adapting and combining deliberative designs : juries, polls, and forums The deliberative democracy handbook: Strategies for effective civic engagement in the twenty-first century. pp. 120- 138 ,(2005)
John S. Dryzek, Deliberative democracy and beyond : liberals, critics, contestations Oxford University Press. ,(2000)
Thomas Webler, Ortwin Renn, Peter M. Wiedemann, Fairness and competence in citizen participation : evaluating models for environmental discourse Kluwer Academic. ,(1995)
Peter Mcburney, Simon Parsons, David Hitchcock, A Framework for Deliberation Dialogues ,(2001)
Sheila Jasanoff, Science and citizenship: a new synergy Science and Public Policy. ,vol. 31, pp. 90- 94 ,(2004) , 10.3152/147154304781780064
Daniel J. Fiorino, Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms: Science, Technology, & Human Values. ,vol. 15, pp. 226- 243 ,(1990) , 10.1177/016224399001500204
Tom Horlick-Jones, John Walls, Gene Rowe, Nick Pidgeon, Wouter Poortinga, Tim O'riordan, On evaluating the GM Nation? Public debate about the commercialisation of transgenic crops in Britain New Genetics and Society. ,vol. 25, pp. 265- 288 ,(2006) , 10.1080/14636770601032858