The determinants of a successful accounting manuscript: Views of the informed
作者： Tony Brinn , Michael John Jones
DOI: 10.1016/J.ACCFOR.2007.12.002
关键词: Perception 、 Mainstream 、 Publishing 、 Consistency (negotiation) 、 Perspective (graphical) 、 Originality 、 Editorial board 、 Public relations 、 Psychology 、 Accounting
摘要: Abstract Publishing academic articles is a key measure by which the performance of modern academics judged. However, there surprising lack guidance to authors about manuscript characteristics influence journal acceptance decisions. This article reports results study into perceptions 129 editorial board members 87 statements relating publishability manuscripts in accounting journals. The respondents indicated certain factors enhanced chances publication (e.g., statistical significance, originality, appropriate statistics and application theory) detracted from replication, secondary data, polemic pieces, overlapping work accessibility). Reviewers perspective US journals were more concerned with use statistics, generalisability samples case studies. There was high degree consistency results. We found no systematic differences between those adopting critical as opposed mainstream research.
bristol.ac.uk
elsevier.com
sci-hub.se 参考文章(43)
Richard L. Daft, Why I Recommended That Your Manuscript Be Rejected and What You Can Do about it Publishing in the Organizational Sciences. pp. 164- 182 ,(1995) , 10.4135/9781452240466.N14
Jacci L. Rodgers, Paul F. Williams, PATTERNS OF RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY AND KNOWLEDGE CREATION AT THE ACCOUNTING REVIEW: 1967 - 1993 The Accounting historians journal. ,vol. 23, pp. 51- 88 ,(1996) , 10.2308/0148-4184.23.1.51
Robert J. Fleming, Samuel P. Graci, Joel E. Thompson, THE DAWNING OF THE AGE OF QUANTITATIVE/EMPIRICAL METHODS IN ACCOUNTING RESEARCH: EVIDENCE FROM THE LEADING AUTHORS OF THE ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 1966–1985 The Accounting historians journal. ,vol. 27, pp. 43- 72 ,(2000) , 10.2308/0148-4184.27.1.43
Peter J. Frost, Larry L. Cummings, Publishing in the organizational sciences ,(1985)
CHRISTOPHER HUMPHREY, Paper prophets and the continuing case for thinking differently about accounting research British Accounting Review. ,vol. 33, pp. 91- 103 ,(2001) , 10.1006/BARE.2000.0153
TONY BRINN, MICHAEL JONES, MAURICE PENDLEBURY, Why Do UK Accounting and Finance Academics not Publish in top US Journals British Accounting Review. ,vol. 33, pp. 223- 232 ,(2001) , 10.1006/BARE.2001.0160
Richard Whitley, The transformation of business finance into financial economics: The roles of academic expansion and changes in U.S. capital markets Accounting, Organizations and Society. ,vol. 11, pp. 171- 192 ,(1986) , 10.1016/0361-3682(86)90029-2
Thomas A. Lee, Paul F. Williams, ACCOUNTING FROM THE INSIDE: LEGITIMIZING THE ACCOUNTING ACADEMIC ELITE Critical Perspectives on Accounting. ,vol. 10, pp. 867- 895 ,(1999) , 10.1006/CPAC.1998.0281
Rhoda Brown, Michael Jones, Tony Steele, Still flickering at the margins of existence? Publishing patterns and themes in accounting and finance research over the last two decades British Accounting Review. ,vol. 39, pp. 125- 151 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.BAR.2007.03.004
Richard L. Daft, Ricky W. Griffin, Valerie Yates, Retrospective Accounts of Research Factors Associated with Significant and Not-So-Significant Research Outcomes Academy of Management Journal. ,vol. 30, pp. 763- 785 ,(1987) , 10.5465/256159