Ethics and End-of-life Care

作者: J. R. Curtis

DOI: 10.1007/3-540-29730-8_26

关键词: Advance care planningIntensive care unitAcute carePalliative careEmergency medicineIntensive careMedicineQuality of life (healthcare)End-of-life careSeverity of illness

摘要: Because of the severity illness patients in intensive care unit (ICU), ICU is a setting where death common. Approximately 20% all deaths U.S. occur [1]. Although this proportion varies greatly different countries, relatively common most ICUs because these patients. Optimal palliative outpatients and acute long-term settings judicious use for those with terminal or life-limiting may prevent many admissions. Nonetheless, will likely remain an important endof-life both critically ill chronic, diseases their families opt trial if there reasonable chance that have extension life quality [2]. This chapter addresses ethical issues challenges arise providing high to who ultimately die ICU. Several studies documented shortcomings end-of-life For example, one study six hospitals US showed moderate severe pain [3], physicians are unaware patients’ preferences regarding [4] receive often not consistent treatment [3]. Another demonstrated signifi cant burden symptoms among cancer [5]. Studies from Europe show clinicians frequently do communicate adequately family members [6–8]. reasons, improving imperative. Perhaps best ways improve clarify goals advance critical avoid altogether when ICU-based life-sustaining therapies unwanted unlikely provide benefi t. In 1980s, experts believed directives would allow inform about they want at end technologic [9, 10]. Unfortunately, cantly affected aggressiveness costs [11, 12] nor changed decisionmaking [13, 14]. planning prior hospitalization be component [15]. However, even excellent communication, improved prognostication, Ethics End-of-life Care

参考文章(79)
Richard I. Hall, Graeme M. Rocker, Dawnelda Murray, Simple changes can improve conduct of end-of-life care in the intensive care unit. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-journal Canadien D Anesthesie. ,vol. 51, pp. 631- 636 ,(2004) , 10.1007/BF03018408
Lawrence J. Schneiderman, Todd Gilmer, Holly D. Teetzel, Impact of ethics consultations in the intensive care setting: a randomized, controlled trial. Critical Care Medicine. ,vol. 28, pp. 3920- 3924 ,(2000) , 10.1097/00003246-200012000-00033
Joan Teno, Joanne Lynn, Neil Wenger, Russell S. Phillips, Donald P. Murphy, Alfred F. Connors, Norman Desbiens, William Fulkerson, Paul Bellamy, William A. Knaus, Advance Directives for Seriously Ill Hospitalized Patients: Effectiveness with the Patient Self‐Determination Act and the SUPPORT Intervention Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. ,vol. 45, pp. 500- 507 ,(1997) , 10.1111/J.1532-5415.1997.TB05178.X
NED H. CASSEM, Confronting the decision to let death come. Critical Care Medicine. ,vol. 2, pp. 113- 117 ,(1974) , 10.1097/00003246-197405000-00001
Virginia P. Tilden, Decisions About Life-Sustaining Treatment Archives of Internal Medicine. ,vol. 155, pp. 633- 638 ,(1995) , 10.1001/ARCHINTE.1995.00430060097012
L. A. Eidelman, D. J. Jakobson, R. Pizov, D. Geber, L. Leibovitz, C. L. Sprung, Forgoing life-sustaining treatment in an Israeli ICU Intensive Care Medicine. ,vol. 24, pp. 162- 166 ,(1998) , 10.1007/S001340050539
Cari R. Levy, Ely Wesley, Kate Payne, Ruth A. Engelberg, Donald L. Patrick, J. Randall Curtis, Quality of Dying and Death in Two Medical ICUs : Perceptions of Family and Clinicians Chest. ,vol. 127, pp. 1775- 1783 ,(2005) , 10.1378/CHEST.127.5.1775
G. Melltorp, T. Nilstun, The difference between withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment. Intensive Care Medicine. ,vol. 23, pp. 1264- 1267 ,(1997) , 10.1007/S001340050496
Marion Danis, Patients' and Families' Preferences for Medical Intensive Care JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. ,vol. 261, pp. 242- 802 ,(1989) , 10.1001/JAMA.1989.03420020094019