Not having adequate time to make a treatment decision can impact on cancer patients' care experience: Results of a cross-sectional study.

作者: Anne Herrmann , Rob Sanson-Fisher , Alix Hall

DOI: 10.1016/J.PEC.2019.06.011

关键词: Family medicineMedicineOddsTreatment decision makingSecondary analysisCancer treatmentCross-sectional studyLogistic regressionRadiation oncologyCancer

摘要: Abstract Objective We examined whether patients reporting not having adequate time to make a treatment decision is associated with discordance between their preferred and perceived involvement in making. Methods This was secondary analysis of cross-sectional study involving Australian outpatients attending five medical or radiation oncology units. Logistic regression modelling conducted. Results Four hundred twenty-three participated. Patients who reported last important had significantly higher odds experiencing this decision, compared those (OR: 2.76; 95% CI: 1.01–7.55; p = 0.048). Conclusion should receive when making cancer decisions. may help “digest” use the information they received, become involved making, extent desire. Future research further investigate what consider for Practice implications Doctors assess patients’ preferences amount prefer tailor care accordingly. Offering two consultations some think about options in-between these be one method achieving this.

参考文章(22)
Lesley Degner, Jasvinder A Singh, Jeff A Sloan, Pamela J Atherton, Tenbroeck Smith, Thomas F Hack, Mashele M Huschka, Teresa A Rummans, Matthew M Clark, Brent Diekmann, Lesley F Degner, Preferred roles in treatment decision making among patients with cancer: a pooled analysis of studies using the Control Preferences Scale. The American Journal of Managed Care. ,vol. 16, pp. 688- 696 ,(2010)
Gill Hubbard, Lisa Kidd, Edward Donaghy, Preferences for involvement in treatment decision making of patients with cancer: a review of the literature European Journal of Oncology Nursing. ,vol. 12, pp. 299- 318 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.EJON.2008.03.004
Kerry A. Silvia, Elissa M. Ozanne, Karen R. Sepucha, Implementing breast cancer decision aids in community sites: barriers and resources. Health Expectations. ,vol. 11, pp. 46- 53 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1369-7625.2007.00477.X
PN Butow, SM Dunn, MHN Tattersall, QJ Jones, Computer-based interaction analysis of the cancer consultation. British Journal of Cancer. ,vol. 71, pp. 1115- 1121 ,(1995) , 10.1038/BJC.1995.216
A. Coulter, Do patients want a choice and does it work BMJ. ,vol. 341, pp. 973- 975 ,(2010) , 10.1136/BMJ.C4989
A El Turabi, G A Abel, M Roland, G Lyratzopoulos, Variation in reported experience of involvement in cancer treatment decision making: evidence from the National Cancer Patient Experience Survey British Journal of Cancer. ,vol. 109, pp. 780- 787 ,(2013) , 10.1038/BJC.2013.316
Rana Obeidat, Deborah S. Finnell, Robin M. Lally, Decision aids for surgical treatment of early stage breast cancer: A narrative review of the literature Patient Education and Counseling. ,vol. 85, ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.PEC.2011.03.019
Afaf Girgis, Rob W. Sanson-Fisher, Breaking bad news. 1: Current best advice for clinicians. Behavioral Medicine. ,vol. 24, pp. 53- 59 ,(1998) , 10.1080/08964289809596381
R F Brown, P N Butow, S M Dunn, M H N Tattersall, Promoting patient participation and shortening cancer consultations: a randomised trial. British Journal of Cancer. ,vol. 85, pp. 1273- 1279 ,(2001) , 10.1054/BJOC.2001.2073