Blood Ordering Strategies in the Armed Forces - A Proposal.
作者： PK Gupta , Harsh Kumar , RN Diwan
DOI: 10.1016/S0377-1237(03)80139-9
关键词: Retrospective cohort study 、 Medicine 、 Schedule (computer science) 、 Medical emergency 、 Tertiary care hospital 、 Intensive care medicine
摘要: Over ordering blood is a common practice in medicine. This can be corrected by simple means of changing the pattern. A retrospective study was carried out tertiary care hospital Armed Forces for three year period to strategies hospital. The total units demanded and corresponding issued were estimated. Thereafter, transfusion probability ratio cross-matched actual transfused (C/T ratio) calculated. In this study, using Mead's criterion, C/T ratio, guidelines all cases requiring proposed. also identifies where ‘Type Screen’ (T&S) procedure could introduced low. other group high, maximum surgical schedule (MSBOS) has been determined identify number kept ready before procedure. implementation proposal will avoid over-ordering promote utilization.
elsevier.com
sci-hub.se 参考文章(9)
G N Kakepoto, T Chawla, M A Khan, An audit of Blood cross-match ordering practices at the Aga Khan University Hospital: First step towards a maximum Surgical Blood ordering schedule Journal of Pakistan Medical Association. ,vol. 51, pp. 251- 254 ,(2001)
M Vibhute, A Shetty, S K Kamath, Blood utilisation in elective general surgery cases: requirements, ordering and transfusion practices Journal of Postgraduate Medicine. ,vol. 46, pp. 13- 17 ,(2000)
Layla A. Bashawri, Pattern of blood procurement, ordering and utilization in a University Hospital in Eastern Saudi Arabia. Saudi Medical Journal. ,vol. 23, pp. 555- 561 ,(2002)
G. Galea, H.I. Atrah, S.J. Urbaniak, The sustained impact of a group and screen and maximum surgical blood ordering schedule policy on the transfusion practice in gynaecology and obstetrics. Clinical and Laboratory Haematology. ,vol. 17, pp. 177- 181 ,(1995) , 10.1111/J.1365-2257.1995.TB01228.X
LI Boral, JB Henry, The type and screen: a safe alternative and supplement in selected surgical procedures Transfusion. ,vol. 17, pp. 163- 168 ,(1977) , 10.1046/J.1537-2995.1977.17277151923.X
B. A. Friedman, H. A. Oberman, A. R. Chadwick, K. I. Kingdon, The maximum surgical blood order schedule and surgical blood use in the United States. Transfusion. ,vol. 16, pp. 380- 387 ,(2003) , 10.1046/J.1537-2995.1976.16476247063.X
R.D. Finney, Progress in transfusion medicine: Volume 3 Edited by J. D. Cash. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 1988. pp 232. £45.00 Fibrinolysis and Proteolysis. ,vol. 3, pp. 55- ,(1989) , 10.1016/0268-9499(89)90029-5
Jay H. Mead, Cynthia D. Anthony, Mildred Sattler, Hemotherapy in elective surgery: an incidence report, review of the literature, and alternatives for guideline appraisal. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. ,vol. 74, pp. 223- 227 ,(1980) , 10.1093/AJCP/74.2.223
Ravishankar M, Ananthakrishnan N, Bhutia Sg, Jayanthi S, Srinivasan K, Blood utilization in elective surgery--requirements, ordering and transfusion practices. The National Medical Journal of India. ,vol. 10, pp. 164- 168 ,(1997)