Monitoring Primary Systemic Therapy of Large and Locally Advanced Breast Cancer by Using Sequential Positron Emission Tomography Imaging With [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose

作者: Jörg Schwarz-Dose , Michael Untch , Reinhold Tiling , Stefanie Sassen , Sven Mahner

DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.2650

关键词: Locally advancedSystemic therapyFluorodeoxyglucoseHistopathologic responseBreast cancerNuclear medicineMedicinePositron emission tomographyBreast diseaseCancerCancer researchOncology

摘要: Purpose To evaluate positron emission tomography (PET) using [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) for prediction of histopathologic response early during primary systemic therapy of large or locally advanced breast cancer. Patients and Methods In a prospective multicenter trial, 272 FDG-PET scans were performed in 104 patients at baseline (n = 104) and after the first (n = 87) and second cycle (n = 81) of chemotherapy. The level and relative changes in standardized uptake value (SUV) of FDG uptake were assessed regarding their ability to predict histopathologic response. All patients underwent surgery after chemotherapy, and histopathologic response defined as minimal residual disease or gross residual disease served as the reference standard. Results Seventeen (16%) of 104 patients were histopathologic responders and 87 were (84%) nonresponders. All patients for whom baseline SUV was less than 3.0 (n = 24) did not achieve a histopathologic response. SUV decreased by 51% ± 18% after the first cycle of chemotherapy in histopathologic responders (n = 15), compared with 37% ± 21% in nonresponders (n = 54; P = .01). A threshold of 45% decrease in SUV correctly identified 11 of 15 responders, and histopathologic nonresponders were identified with a negative predictive value of 90%. Similar results were found after the second cycle when using a threshold of 55% relative decrease in SUV. Conclusion FDG-PET allows for prediction of treatment response by the level of FDG uptake in terms of SUV at baseline and after each cycle of chemotherapy. Moreover, relative changes in SUV after the first and second cycle are a strong predictor of response. Thus, FDG-PET may be helpful for individual treatment stratification in breast cancer patients.

参考文章(37)
Christoph Nerl, Christoph Fuchs, Sibylle Ziegler, Markus Schwaiger, Wolfgang Römer, Axel-R. Hanauske, Wolfgang Weber, Ralf Thödtmann, Manfred Garbrecht, Wolfgang Enne, Michael Herz, Positron Emission Tomography in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Assessment of Chemotherapy With Fluorodeoxyglucose Blood. ,vol. 91, pp. 4464- 4471 ,(1998) , 10.1182/BLOOD.V91.12.4464
M. Schelling, N. Avril, J. Nährig, W. Kuhn, W. Römer, D. Sattler, M. Werner, J. Dose, F. Jänicke, H. Graeff, M. Schwaiger, Positron Emission Tomography Using [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose for Monitoring Primary Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Journal of Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 18, pp. 1689- 1695 ,(2000) , 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.8.1689
Wolfgang A. Weber, Katja Ott, Karen Becker, Hans-Joachim Dittler, Hermann Helmberger, Norbert E. Avril, Günther Meisetschläger, Raymonde Busch, Jörg-Rüdiger Siewert, Markus Schwaiger, Ulrich Fink, Prediction of Response to Preoperative Chemotherapy in Adenocarcinomas of the Esophagogastric Junction by Metabolic Imaging Journal of Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 19, pp. 3058- 3065 ,(2001) , 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.12.3058
G Bonadonna, P Valagussa, C Brambilla, L Ferrari, A Moliterni, M Terenziani, M Zambetti, Primary chemotherapy in operable breast cancer: eight-year experience at the Milan Cancer Institute. Journal of Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 16, pp. 93- 100 ,(1998) , 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.1.93
Garry M. McDermott, Andrew Welch, Roger T. Staff, Fiona J. Gilbert, Lutz Schweiger, Scott I. K. Semple, Tim A. D. Smith, Andrew W. Hutcheon, Iain D. Miller, Ian C. Smith, Steven D. Heys, Monitoring primary breast cancer throughout chemotherapy using FDG-PET Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. ,vol. 102, pp. 75- 84 ,(2007) , 10.1007/S10549-006-9316-7
Wolfgang A. Weber, Volker Petersen, Burkhard Schmidt, Leishia Tyndale-Hines, Thomas Link, Christian Peschel, Markus Schwaiger, Positron Emission Tomography in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Prediction of Response to Chemotherapy by Quantitative Assessment of Glucose Use Journal of Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 21, pp. 2651- 2657 ,(2003) , 10.1200/JCO.2003.12.004
Florian Lordick, Katja Ott, Bernd-Joachim Krause, Wolfgang A Weber, Karen Becker, Hubert J Stein, Sylvie Lorenzen, Tibor Schuster, Hinrich Wieder, Ken Herrmann, Rainer Bredenkamp, Heinz Höfler, Ulrich Fink, Christian Peschel, Markus Schwaiger, Jörg R Siewert, PET to assess early metabolic response and to guide treatment of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction: the MUNICON phase II trial. Lancet Oncology. ,vol. 8, pp. 797- 805 ,(2007) , 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70244-9
P Chollet, S Amat, H Cure, M de Latour, G Le Bouedec, M-A Mouret-Reynier, J-P Ferriere, J-L Achard, J Dauplat, F Penault-Llorca, Prognostic significance of a complete pathological response after induction chemotherapy in operable breast cancer British Journal of Cancer. ,vol. 86, pp. 1041- 1046 ,(2002) , 10.1038/SJ.BJC.6600210
AH Honkoop, PJ van Diest, JS de Jong, SC Linn, G Giaccone, K Hoekman, J Wagstaff, HM Pinedo, Prognostic role of clinical, pathological and biological characteristics in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. British Journal of Cancer. ,vol. 77, pp. 621- 626 ,(1998) , 10.1038/BJC.1998.99
Michael P. Mac Manus, Rodney J. Hicks, Jane P. Matthews, Allan McKenzie, Danny Rischin, Eeva K. Salminen, David L. Ball, Positron Emission Tomography Is Superior to Computed Tomography Scanning for Response-Assessment After Radical Radiotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Journal of Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 21, pp. 1285- 1292 ,(2003) , 10.1200/JCO.2003.07.054