Spatially Differentiated Sustainability Assessment for the Design of Global Supply Chains

作者: Christian Thies , Karsten Kieckhäfer , Thomas S Spengler , Manbir S Sodhi , None

DOI: 10.1016/J.PROCIR.2017.11.001

关键词: Assessment methodsProduct (business)Production (economics)BusinessEnvironmental economicsImpact assessmentSupply chainResource (project management)SustainabilityData flow model

摘要: Abstract Supply chains of modern products are often characterized by globally dispersed activities that have ecological, economic, and social impacts. Life cycle-oriented sustainability assessment methods usually aim at compiling the total impacts a product without explicitly considering their spatial distribution. This may be problematic because regional characteristics technology environment ignored opportunities for tradeoffs between local global measures hidden. paper proposes framework spatially differentiated to support design supply chains. The comprises resource flow model links production processes specific locations, multi-scale impact derive indicators, multi-criteria evaluation balancing preferences different stakeholders. An illustrative example shows application this simplified chain beer leads results when alternative structures compared.

参考文章(25)
Walter Kloepffer, Life cycle sustainability assessment of products International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 13, pp. 89- 95 ,(2008) , 10.1065/LCA2008.02.376
John Reap, Felipe Roman, Scott Duncan, Bert Bras, A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 13, pp. 290- 300 ,(2008) , 10.1007/S11367-008-0008-X
Adel Guitouni, Jean-Marc Martel, Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method European Journal of Operational Research. ,vol. 109, pp. 501- 521 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00073-3
Alessandra Zamagni, Hanna-Leena Pesonen, Thomas Swarr, From LCA to Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: Concept, practice and future directions International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 18, pp. 1637- 1641 ,(2013) , 10.1007/S11367-013-0648-3
Matthias Finkbeiner, Erwin M. Schau, Annekatrin Lehmann, Marzia Traverso, Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment Sustainability. ,vol. 2, pp. 3309- 3322 ,(2010) , 10.3390/SU2103309
Bruna Mota, Maria Isabel Gomes, Ana Carvalho, Ana Paula Barbosa-Povoa, Towards supply chain sustainability: economic, environmental and social design and planning Journal of Cleaner Production. ,vol. 105, pp. 14- 27 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2014.07.052
Bo P. Weidema, The Integration of Economic and Social Aspects in Life Cycle Impact Assessment The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 11, pp. 89- 96 ,(2006) , 10.1065/LCA2006.04.016
Christopher L. Mutel, Stefanie Hellweg, Regionalized life cycle assessment: computational methodology and application to inventory databases. Environmental Science & Technology. ,vol. 43, pp. 5797- 5803 ,(2009) , 10.1021/ES803002J
José Potting, Wolfgang Schöpp, Kornelis Blok, Michael Hauschild, Site‐Dependent Life‐Cycle Impact Assessment of Acidification Journal of Industrial Ecology. ,vol. 2, pp. 63- 87 ,(1998) , 10.1162/JIEC.1998.2.2.63
Andreas Jørgensen, Agathe Le Bocq, Liudmila Nazarkina, Michael Hauschild, Methodologies for social life cycle assessment International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 13, pp. 96- 103 ,(2008) , 10.1065/LCA2007.11.367