作者: Kathleen R. Smith , Steven R. Lawyer , Joshua K. Swift
DOI: 10.1037/PHA0000167
关键词: PsycINFO 、 Cognitive psychology 、 Discounting 、 Delay discounting 、 Meta-analysis 、 Psychology 、 Web of science 、 MEDLINE 、 Extant taxon 、 Probabilistic logic 、 Pharmacology (medical) 、 Pharmacology 、 Psychiatry and Mental health
摘要: Delay discounting (DD) and probability (PD) are behavioral measures of choice that index sensitivity to delayed probabilistic outcomes, which associated with a range negative health-related outcomes. Patterns tend be predictable, where preferences for immediate (vs. delayed) certain probabilistic) rewards change as function delay probability. However, some participants yield nonsystematic response patterns (NSR) cannot accounted by theories could have implications the validity discounting-related experiments. Johnson Bickel (2008) outline an algorithm identifying NSR in discounting, but typical frequency methodological predictors not yet established extant literature. In this meta-analytic review, we identified papers analysis searching Web Science, PubMed, PsycInfo databases until November 8, 2015 experiments responders using Bickel's algorithm. This yielded 114 data reported. The overall across DD PD studies was 18% 19%, respectively. Nonmonetary outcomes (e.g., drugs, food, sex) significantly more than did monetary Participants recruited from university setting had nonuniversity settings. Our review also indicates researchers inconsistent whether or how they report studies, is relevant clearer understanding mechanisms underlie impulsive choice. We make several recommendations regarding assessment research. (PsycINFO Database Record