From Knowledge Co-production to Transdisciplinary Research: Lessons from the Quest to Produce Socially Robust Knowledge

作者: Juergen Weichselgartner , Bernhard Truffer

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-16477-9_5

关键词: Diversity (politics)Openness to experienceTransdisciplinarityVariety (cybernetics)Knowledge managementFlexibility (personality)Nexus (standard)Political scienceMultidisciplinary approachTransformation processesEngineering ethics

摘要: During the past decades, a variety of approaches have emerged to understand and explain transformation processes at science-society interface. Under different labels, these concepts propagated shift from academic, investigator-initiated, discipline-based research more context-driven, problem-focused, multidisciplinary research. These provide core motivational background for specific transdisciplinary initiatives. This article provides an overview understandings divergent styles research, its multifaceted dimensions, pathways, challenges. Practical examples illustrate emergence programs in response new intellectual pragmatic developments. It is concluded that transdisciplinarity gathers heterogeneous sets relationships between epistemic ends means. The authors recommend paying attention qualities necessary understanding practical knowledge enable realization, abilities make implementation findings possible. believed need openness, flexibility, diversity uncertainty will inspire further democratic ways re-organize nexus.

参考文章(67)
Janet A. Kourany, Martin Carrier, Don Howard, The challenge of the social and the pressure of practice : science and values revisited University of Pittsburgh Press. ,(2008)
Herman E. Daly, Joy A. Bartholomew, Robert Costanza, Goals, agenda, and policy recommendations for ecological economics ,(1991)
Joske F.G. Bunders, Jacqueline E.W. Broerse, Florian Keil, Christian Pohl, Roland W. Scholz, Marjolein B.M. Zweekhorst, How can transdisciplinary research contribute to knowledge democracy? Knowledge Democracy. pp. 125- 152 ,(2010) , 10.1007/978-3-642-11381-9_11
Gernot Böhme, Wolfgang van den Daele, Wolfgang Krohn, Die Finalisierung der Wissenschaft Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie. ,vol. 2, pp. 128- 144 ,(1973) , 10.1515/ZFSOZ-1973-0202
Sheldon Krimsky, Dominic Golding, None, Social Theories of Risk Praeger. ,(1992)