The epiknowledge of socially responsible innovation

作者: Edward S Dove , Vural Özdemir

DOI: 10.1002/EMBR.201438683

关键词: PoliticsSocial responsibilityMidstreamIndustrial researchHumanismSociologyUpstream (petroleum industry)Environmental ethicsApplied researchWork (electrical)

摘要: In their discussion of socially responsible innovation (SRI) and its links to industrial R&D academic applied research, Flipse et al [1] acknowledge that the nature purpose research have changed “to demonstrate social or environmental responsibility contribute a more positive corporate image.” We wish authors had focused on last word, “image,” for it is an admission theatrical play being acted out in today's conceal true SRI. Any ensuing about establishing mutual understanding common language between natural sciences “efficiently work together” misses heart issue: how political forces change similarly changes role scientists humanists. SRI now considered indispensable factor robust R&D. Ideally, performed upstream midstream early stages rather than as afterthought, so …

参考文章(3)
Steven M Flipse, Maarten C A Sanden, Maud Radstake, Johannes H De Winde, Patricia Osseweijer, The DNA of socially responsible innovation EMBO reports. ,vol. 15, pp. 134- 137 ,(2014) , 10.1002/EMBR.201337949
Edward S. Dove, Vural Özdemir, Glocal Bioethics: When International IRB Collaboration Confronts Local Politics The American Journal of Bioethics. ,vol. 14, pp. 20- 23 ,(2014) , 10.1080/15265161.2014.892178
Edward S Dove, Samer A Faraj, Eugene Kolker, Vural Özdemir, Designing a post-genomics knowledge ecosystem to translate pharmacogenomics into public health action. Genome Medicine. ,vol. 4, pp. 91- 91 ,(2012) , 10.1186/GM392