Decision Making: The Patient’s Perspective

作者: Dawn Stacey , France Légaré

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84996-492-0_5

关键词: RegretBlameR-CASTDecision analysisDecision qualityBusiness decision mappingPsychologyUncertaintyActuarial scienceDecisional conflict

摘要: There are major gaps in the quality of decisions about treatment options that involve making tradeoffs between benefits and harms.1 Following standard counseling, patients score ‘D’ on knowledge tests ‘F’ their understanding probabilities harms. Moreover, there is a mismatch harms value most option chosen. Patients participate decision less than they prefer some have high levels decisional conflict, which an independent predictor downstream dissatisfaction, regret tendency to blame doctor for bad outcomes.2–4 Decisional conflict defined as personal uncertainty course action when risk, loss, or challenge values.5 The underlying mechanisms explaining poor patients’ difficulties recalling facts probabilistic nature evidence regarding each available (benefits harms), surgeons’ judging values place versus clear need improve way prepared surgeons counsel options.

参考文章(60)
Kuppermann M, Rimer Bk, Pauker Sg, Dow Rw, Fisher R, Fisher Es, Angell M, Ratliff A, Faughnan Me, Pauker Sp, Nease Rf, Redelmeier Da, Sox Hc, What is a good decision Effective clinical practice : ECP. ,vol. 2, pp. 185- 197 ,(1999)
John E Wennberg, Philip G Peters, Unwarranted variations in the quality of health care: can the law help medicine provide a remedy/remedies? Specialty law digest. Health care law. pp. 9- 25 ,(2004)
A. Towle, W. Godolphin, T. Greenhalgh, J. Gambrill, Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making. BMJ. ,vol. 319, pp. 766- 771 ,(1999) , 10.1136/BMJ.319.7212.766
Donalee Moulton, “Patient navigators” newest members of NS health care team Canadian Medical Association Journal. ,vol. 167, pp. 295- 295 ,(2002)
France Légaré, Stephen Kearing, Kate Clay, Susie Gagnon, Denis D’Amours, Michel Rousseau, Annette O’Connor, None, Are you SURE?: Assessing patient decisional conflict with a 4-item screening test Canadian Family Physician. ,vol. 56, ,(2010)
Dawn Stacey, France Légaré, Krystina Lewis, Michael J Barry, Carol L Bennett, Karen B Eden, Margaret Holmes‐Rovner, Hilary Llewellyn‐Thomas, Anne Lyddiatt, Richard Thomson, Lyndal Trevena, None, Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. ,vol. 4, pp. 0- 0 ,(2017) , 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.PUB5
Donald J. Kiesler, Stephen M. Auerbach, Optimal matches of patient preferences for information, decision-making and interpersonal behavior: evidence, models and interventions. Patient Education and Counseling. ,vol. 61, pp. 319- 341 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.PEC.2005.08.002
Melina Gattellari, Phyllis N Butow, Martin H.N Tattersall, Sharing decisions in cancer care. Social Science & Medicine. ,vol. 52, pp. 1865- 1878 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00303-8
Anssi Auvinen, Liisa Määttänen, Patrik Finne, Ulf‐Håkan Stenman, Jussi Aro, Harri Juusela, Sakari Rannikko, Teuvo LJ Tammela, Matti Hakama, None, TEST SENSITIVITY OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN IN THE FINNISH RANDOMISED PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING TRIAL International Journal of Cancer. ,vol. 111, pp. 940- 943 ,(2004) , 10.1002/IJC.20352