作者: Simon J. Fielke , Geoff A. Wilson
DOI: 10.1007/S10708-016-9729-8
关键词: Corporate governance 、 Economic growth 、 Agricultural policy 、 Development economics 、 Sustainability 、 Politics 、 Human geography 、 Agriculture 、 Agricultural communication 、 Economics 、 Intervention (law) 、 Geography, Planning and Development
摘要: Critiques of the neoliberal governance agricultural systems have led to a number political responses which attempt address socio-environmental consequences dominant regime. In this paper two case study regions (South Australia and England) been chosen represent variations in policy highlight subsequent outcomes on sustainability agriculture. Interviewed stakeholders highlighted issues regard each area, from social environmental minimal intervention South Australia, created by greater economic support England. As such, distinct regimes will continue demand scholarly attention, order for value diversity within sector be more widely understood. The concludes that it is likely decline both regions. Importantly, however, innovative mechanisms aim reduce local risks priorities, without requiring significant financial support, might most promising way forward system sustainability.