Justifications for Non-Consensual Medical Intervention: From Infectious Disease Control to Criminal Rehabilitation.

作者: Jonathan Pugh , Thomas Douglas

DOI: 10.1080/0731129X.2016.1247519

关键词: Infectious disease (medical specialty)Psychological interventionSociologyRehabilitationPunishmentIntervention (counseling)Social psychologyPsychotherapistPublic healthInformed consentMedical ethics

摘要: A central tenet of medical ethics holds that it is permissible to perform a intervention on competent individual only if has given informed consent the intervention. Yet occasionally seems morally carry out non-consensual interventions individuals for purpose infectious disease control (IDC). We describe two different moral frameworks have been invoked in support IDC and identify five desiderata might be used guide assessments permissibility such either kind fundamental justification. then consider what these imply justifiability carrying are designed facilitate rehabilitation amongst serious criminal offenders. argue suggest plausible case can made favor interventions.

参考文章(63)
Fiona Leverick, Killing in Self-Defence ,(2007)
Toward a model of the legal doctrine of informed consent. American Journal of Psychiatry. ,vol. 134, pp. 285- ,(1977) , 10.1176/AJP.134.3.285
James Stacey Taylor, Practical Autonomy and Bioethics ,(2009)
Jeff McMahan, Killing in War ,(2009)
Derk Pereboom, Living without free will ,(2001)
Jeremy Bentham, Theory of Legislation ,(1874)
Jane A Dennis, Omer Khan, Michael Ferriter, Nick Huband, Melanie J Powney, Conor Duggan, Pharmacological interventions for those who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. ,vol. 12, pp. 360- 360 ,(2008) , 10.1002/14651858.CD007507.PUB2
David K. Ho, Callum C. Ross, Cognitive behaviour therapy for sex offenders. Too good to be true? Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health. ,vol. 22, pp. 1- 6 ,(2012) , 10.1002/CBM.1818