Factors influencing societal response of nanotechnology: an expert stakeholder analysis
作者： Nidhi Gupta , Arnout R. H. Fischer , Ivo A. van der Lans , Lynn J. Frewer
DOI: 10.1007/S11051-012-0857-X
关键词: Materials science 、 Nanotechnology 、 Applications of nanotechnology 、 Expert opinion 、 Repertory grid 、 Stakeholder analysis 、 Expert judgement 、 Emerging technologies 、 North west 、 Repertory grid method
摘要: Nanotechnology can be described as an emerging technology and, has been the case with other technologies such genetic modifi- cation, different socio-psychological factors will potentially influence societal responses to its devel- opment and application. These play important role in how nanotechnology is developed commercialised. This article aims identify expert opinion on influencing response applications of nanotechnology. Structured inter- views experts from North West Europe were conducted using repertory grid methodology conjunction generalized Procrustes analysis examine psychological constructs underlying uptake 15 key drawn areas (e.g. medicine, agriculture environment, chemical, food, military, sports, cosmetics). Based judgement, main nano- extent which are perceived beneficial, useful, necessary, 'real' physically close end-user these by public.
springer.com
paperity.org
harvard.edu参考文章(62)
M.C. Roco, Broader Societal Issues of Nanotechnology Journal of Nanoparticle Research. ,vol. 5, pp. 181- 189 ,(2003) , 10.1023/A:1025548512438
Federico Messina, Anna Saba, Aida Turrini, Monique Raats, Margaret Lumbers, Food in Later Life Team, Older people's perceptions towards conventional and functional yoghurts through the repertory grid method: A cross‐country study British Food Journal. ,vol. 110, pp. 790- 804 ,(2008) , 10.1108/00070700810893322
KEVIN WEBSTER, CINDY JARDINE, SEAN B. CASH, LYNN M. MCMULLEN, Risk ranking: investigating expert and public differences in evaluating food safety hazards. Journal of Food Protection. ,vol. 73, pp. 1875- 1885 ,(2010) , 10.4315/0362-028X-73.10.1875
James W. Grice, Idiogrid: Software for the management and analysis of repertory grids Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers. ,vol. 34, pp. 338- 341 ,(2002) , 10.3758/BF03195461
Marleen van de Kerkhof, Eefje Cuppen, Matthijs Hisschemöller, The repertory grid to unfold conflicting positions: The case of a stakeholder dialogue on prospects for hydrogen Technological Forecasting and Social Change. ,vol. 76, pp. 422- 432 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2008.07.004
Susanna Priest, The North American opinion climate for nanotechnology and its products: Opportunities and challenges Journal of Nanoparticle Research. ,vol. 8, pp. 563- 568 ,(2006) , 10.1007/S11051-005-9060-7
Ellen van Kleef, Hans C.M. van Trijp, Pieternel Luning, Consumer research in the early stages of new product development: a critical review of methods and techniques Food Quality and Preference. ,vol. 16, pp. 181- 201 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.FOODQUAL.2004.05.012
Elizabeth A. Corley, Dietram A. Scheufele, Qian Hu, Of risks and regulations: how leading U.S. nanoscientists form policy stances about nanotechnology Journal of Nanoparticle Research. ,vol. 11, pp. 1573- 1585 ,(2009) , 10.1007/S11051-009-9671-5
Regula Valérie Burri, Sergio Bellucci, Public perception of nanotechnology Journal of Nanoparticle Research. ,vol. 10, pp. 387- 391 ,(2008) , 10.1007/S11051-007-9286-7
Amber Ronteltap, Arnout R. H. Fischer, Hilde Tobi, Societal response to nanotechnology: converging technologies–converging societal response research? Journal of Nanoparticle Research. ,vol. 13, pp. 4399- 4410 ,(2011) , 10.1007/S11051-011-0473-1