Can Decision Analysis Help Us Decide Whether Ultrasound Screening for Fetal Anomalies Is Worth It

作者: PATRICK S. ROMANO , NORMAN J. WAITZMAN

DOI: 10.1111/J.1749-6632.1998.TB08936.X

关键词: GynecologyUltrasoundGeneralizability theoryMedicineObstetricsMonitoring programUltrasound screeningDecision analysisFetusRandomized controlled trialLive birth

摘要: : Decision analysis is a widely used tool to improve clinical decision making when randomized controlled trials are infeasible, underpowered, or lack generalizability. We performed an exploratory of routine second trimester ultrasound detect fetal anomalies, focusing on the assumptions that would have greatest impact. Six outcome categories were considered: (1) abnormal ultrasound, anomalous child, (2) elective abortion fetus, (3) healthy (4) (5) normal and (6) child. Live birth death rates for nine sonographically detectable anomalies obtained from California Birth Defects Monitoring Program. The sensitivity specificity estimated through meta-analysis recent series. Plausible ranges probabilities cesarean delivery abortion, by anomaly, determined review literature. Standard gamble, willingness-to-pay, human capital estimates utility rescaled comparability. found appears be preferred strategy most women. This choice sensitive primarily women's willingness-to-pay reassurance ultrasound.

参考文章(97)
N Stoodley, A Sharma, H Noblett, D James, Influence of place of delivery on outcome in babies with gastroschisis. Archives of Disease in Childhood. ,vol. 68, pp. 321- 323 ,(1993) , 10.1136/ADC.68.3_SPEC_NO.321
Z. Papp, E. Tóh-Pál, Cs. Papp, Z. Tóz, M. Szabó, L. Veress, O. Tórók, Impact of prenatal mid-trimester screening on the prevalence of fetal structural anomalies: a prospective epidemiological study Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 6, pp. 320- 326 ,(1995) , 10.1046/J.1469-0705.1995.06050320.X
Paul S. Heckerling, Marion S. Verp, Amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling for prenatal genetic testing: A decision analysis Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. ,vol. 44, pp. 657- 670 ,(1991) , 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90027-7
E. Merz, F. Bahlmann, G. Weber, Volume scanning in the evaluation of fetal malformations: a new dimension in prenatal diagnosis Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 5, pp. 222- 227 ,(1995) , 10.1046/J.1469-0705.1995.05040222.X
Sheldon J. Bond, Michael R. Harrison, Roy A. Filly, Peter W. Callen, Robert A. Anderson, Mitchell S. Golbus, Severity of intestinal damage in gastroschisis: correlation with prenatal sonographic findings. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. ,vol. 23, pp. 520- 525 ,(1988) , 10.1016/S0022-3468(88)80360-9
Mark Spranca, Elisa Minsk, Jonathan Baron, Omission and commission in judgment and choice Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. ,vol. 27, pp. 76- 105 ,(1991) , 10.1016/0022-1031(91)90011-T
Donald M. Berwick, Milton C. Weinstein, What do patients value? Willingness to pay for ultrasound in normal pregnancy. Medical Care. ,vol. 23, pp. 881- 893 ,(1985) , 10.1097/00005650-198507000-00005
Lindsey D. Allan, Gurleen K. Sharland, Anna Milburn, Susan M. Lockhart, Alison M.M. Groves, Robert H. Anderson, Andrew C. Cook, L.K. Nuala, Prospective diagnosis of 1,006 consecutive cases of congenital heart disease in the fetus☆ Journal of the American College of Cardiology. ,vol. 23, pp. 1452- 1458 ,(1994) , 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90391-3
Vibeke Brocks, Jens Bang, Routine examination by ultrasound for the detection of fetal malformations in a low risk population. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy. ,vol. 6, pp. 37- 45 ,(1991) , 10.1159/000263623
Abdallah M. Adra, Helain J. Landy, Jaime Nahmias, Orlando Gómez-Marín, The fetus with gastroschisis: Impact of route of delivery and prenatal ultrasonography American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 174, pp. 540- 546 ,(1996) , 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70424-6