Compost and vermicompost as nursery pot components: effects on tomato plant growth and morphology

作者: J. Arnold , A. Tato , J.G. Zaller , J. Domínguez , C. Lazcano

DOI: 10.5424/SJAR/2009074-1107

关键词: AmendmentCompostCrop yieldPlant morphologyPottingAgronomyBiologyVermicompostPeatBiomass

摘要: Post transplant success after nursery stage is strongly influenced by plant morphology. Cultural practices shape morphology, and substrate choice one of the most determining factors. Peat often used amendment in commercial potting substrates, involving exploitation non-renewable resources degradation highly valuable peatland ecosystems therefore alternative substrates are required. Here feasibility replacing peat compost or vermicompost for production tomato plants nurseries was investigated through study effect increasing proportions these (0%, 10%, 20%, 50%, 75% 100%) target growth morphological features, indicators adequate post-transplant yield. Compost showed to be growth. Total replacement possible while doses higher than 50% caused mortality. Low (10 20%) high produced significant increases aerial root biomass plants. In addition treatments improved significantly morphology (higher number leaves leaf area, increased volume branching). The use constitute an attractive due environmental benefits involved but also observed improvement quality.

参考文章(33)
A Marcos, BRITO Alvarez, SERGE Gagne, HANI ANTOUN, None, Effect of compost on rhizosphere microflora of the tomato and on the incidence of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. ,vol. 61, pp. 194- 199 ,(1995) , 10.1128/AEM.61.1.194-199.1995
Hala I Chaoui, Larry M Zibilske, Tsutomu Ohno, Effects of earthworm casts and compost on soil microbial activity and plant nutrient availability Soil Biology & Biochemistry. ,vol. 35, pp. 295- 302 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00279-1
G. K. Sims, T. R. Ellsworth, R. L. Mulvaney, Microscale determination of inorganic nitrogen in water and soil extracts Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. ,vol. 26, pp. 303- 316 ,(1995) , 10.1080/00103629509369298
C. Tognetti, F. Laos, M.J. Mazzarino, M.T. Hernández, Composting vs. Vermicomposting: A Comparison of End Product Quality Compost Science & Utilization. ,vol. 13, pp. 6- 13 ,(2005) , 10.1080/1065657X.2005.10702212
P. N. Soltanpour, A. P. Schwab, A new soil test for simultaneous extraction of macro‐ and micro‐nutrients in alkaline soils Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. ,vol. 8, pp. 195- 207 ,(1977) , 10.1080/00103627709366714
R. A. Robertson, Peat, horticulture and environment Biodiversity and Conservation. ,vol. 2, pp. 541- 547 ,(1993) , 10.1007/BF00056747
A. N. Burdett, D. G. Simpson, C. F. Thompson, Root development and plantation establishment success Tree Root Systems and Their Mycorrhizas. ,vol. 71, pp. 103- 110 ,(1983) , 10.1007/978-94-009-6833-2_10
Cristina Lazcano, María Gómez-Brandón, Jorge Domínguez, Comparison of the effectiveness of composting and vermicomposting for the biological stabilization of cattle manure. Chemosphere. ,vol. 72, pp. 1013- 1019 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2008.04.016
F. Herrera, J.E. Castillo, A.F. Chica, L. López Bellido, Use of municipal solid waste compost (MSWC) as a growing medium in the nursery production of tomato plants Bioresource Technology. ,vol. 99, pp. 287- 296 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2006.12.042