Monogamy: Cause, Consequence or Corollary of Success in Wild Canids?

作者: David W. Macdonald , Liz A. D. Campbell , Jan F. Kamler , Jorgelina Marino , Geraldine Werhahn

DOI: 10.3389/FEVO.2019.00341

关键词: AdaptationPaternal careSocialityBiologyFlexibility (personality)CorollaryEvolutionary biologyCommon denominatorPair bondMating

摘要: The Canidae are successful, being a widespread, abundant, speciose, and adaptable family. Several canids in particular have recently experienced rapid expansions range abundance, with similar situations mirrored on several continents by different species. Despite extreme behavioural diversity between within species, monogamy is common denominator canid societies. In this review, we ask why monogamous how related to their success. We begin an overview of social monogamy, describing the pair bonding, paternal care, often alloparental care that characteristic family, discuss theories evolution mammalian monogamy. maintained canids, either voluntarily or enforced, ecological conditions influence functional advantages ability for enforcement thus whether maintained. Social does not necessitate exclusive mating many exhibit extra-pair paternity. consider costs benefits male female can shift cost/benefit balance affect its prevalence. Monogamy may be responsible unusual reproductive characteristics through facilitating enforcement, domestic dogs’ departure from supports our interpretation it adaptation resource availability. asking responsible, at least part, success, propose as pro-cooperative hypothesis, suggesting four contributed success: 1. flexibility, 2. high mobility, 3. rates, 4. sociality/cooperation, latter two consequences These interconnected traits enhance one another combination, foundation enabling cooperative sociality thereby enhanced reproduction survival, together comprise formula

参考文章(278)
Peter N. M. Brotherton, Petr E. Komers, Mate guarding and the evolution of social monogamy in mammals Cambridge University Press. pp. 42- 58 ,(2003) , 10.1017/CBO9781139087247.003
Michael K. Phillips, Edward E. Bangs, L. David Mech, Brian T. Kelly, Buddy B. Fazio, Extermination and recovery of red wolf and grey wolf in the contiguous United States pp. 297- 309 ,(2004) , 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780198515562.003.0019
Warren B. Ballard, Jan F. Kamler, A review of native and nonnative red foxes in North America Wildlife Society Bulletin. ,vol. 30, pp. 370- 379 ,(2002)
David W. Macdonald, Social Factors Affecting Reproduction Amongst Red Foxes Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 123- 175 ,(1980) , 10.1007/978-94-017-5592-4_10
L. David Mech, Luigi Boitani, Wolves University of Chicago Press. ,(2003) , 10.7208/CHICAGO/9780226516981.001.0001
Scott Creel, David Macdonald, Sociality, Group Size, and Reproductive, Suppression among Carnivores Advances in the Study of Behavior. ,vol. 24, pp. 203- 257 ,(1995) , 10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60395-2
Anders Angerbjörn, M. Tannerfeldt, M. Ericson, E. Noren, A. Bjärvall, J. From, Dynamics of the Arctic Fox Population in Sweden Annales Zoologici Fennici. ,vol. 32, pp. 55- 68 ,(1995)
Bruce D. Murphy, Asdell's Patterns of Mammalian Reproduction: A Compendium of Species-specific Data Canadian Veterinary Journal-revue Veterinaire Canadienne. ,vol. 35, pp. 658- 659 ,(1994)
Scott Creel, Nancy Marusha Creel, The African Wild Dog Princeton University Press. ,(2002) , 10.1515/9780691207001