On the Acceptability of Arguments in Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks
作者： C. Cayrol , M. C. Lagasquie-Schiex
DOI: 10.1007/11518655_33
关键词: Mathematical economics 、 Semantics (computer science) 、 Semantics 、 Order (exchange) 、 Focus (linguistics) 、 Computer science 、 Argumentation process 、 Artificial intelligence 、 Coherence (linguistics) 、 Set (psychology) 、 Argumentation framework 、 Relation (database) 、 Argumentation theory
摘要: In this paper, we extend the basic abstract argumentation framework proposed by Dung, taking into account two independent kinds of interaction between arguments: a defeat relation and support relation. that new framework, called bipolar focus on concept acceptability propose semantics defined from characteristic properties set arguments must satisfy in order to be an output process. We generalize well-known stable preferred enforcing coherence requirement for acceptable arguments.
springer.com
springerlink.com
acm.org 参考文章(17)
Salem Benferhat, Souhila Kaci, Henri Prade, Didier Dubois, Bipolar Representation and Fusion of Preferences on the Possibilistic Logic framework. principles of knowledge representation and reasoning. pp. 421- 448 ,(2002)
Leila Amgoud, Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex, Claudette Cayrol, On the bipolarity in argumentation frameworks. non-monotonic reasoning. pp. 1- 9 ,(2004)
Bernadette Bouchon-Meunier, Ronald Yager, Laurent Foulloy, Intelligent Systems for Information Processing: From Representation to Applications ,(2003)
Sek-Wah Tan, Judea Pearl, Specification and Evaluation of Preferences under Uncertainty principles of knowledge representation and reasoning. pp. 530- 539 ,(1994) , 10.1016/B978-1-4832-1452-8.50144-5
Craig Boutilier, Toward a Logic for Qualitative Decision Theory principles of knowledge representation and reasoning. pp. 75- 86 ,(1994) , 10.1016/B978-1-4832-1452-8.50104-4
C. Cayrol, M.C. Lagasquie, Gradual handling of contradiction in argumentation frameworks Intelligent Systems for Information Processing#R##N#From Representation to Applications. pp. 179- 190 ,(2003) , 10.1016/B978-044451379-3/50014-5
Henry Prakken, Gerard Vreeswijk, Logics for Defeasible Argumentation Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 219- 318 ,(2001) , 10.1007/978-94-017-0456-4_3
Stephen Edelston Toulmin, The uses of argument ,(1958)
Franz Guenthner, Dov M. Gabbay, Handbook of Philosophical Logic ,(2018)
Carlos Iván Chesñevar, Ana Gabriela Maguitman, Ronald Prescott Loui, Logical models of argument ACM Computing Surveys. ,vol. 32, pp. 337- 383 ,(2000) , 10.1145/371578.371581