Optimization of photon beam energy in aperture‐based inverse planning

作者: Jason St-Hilaire , Caroline Sévigny , Frédéric Beaulieu , Luc Gingras , Daniel Tremblay

DOI: 10.1120/JACMP.V10I4.3012

关键词: Small numberIntensity modulationReduction (complexity)Medical physicsApertureFunction (mathematics)Energy (signal processing)OpticsPhysicsEnergy minimizationBeam (structure)

摘要: Optimal choice of beam energy in radiation therapy is easy many well-documented cases, but less obvious some others. Low-energy beams may provide better conformity around the target than their high-energy counterparts due to reduced lateral scatter, they also contribute overdosage peripheral normal tissue. Beam was added as an optimization parameter automatic aperture-based inverse planning system. We have investigated two sites (prostate and lung), representative deep-seated moderately tumors. For each case different numbers incidences, four plans were optimized: 6 MV, 23 MV, mixed with one or energies per incidence. Each plan scored a dose-volume cost function. Cost function values, number segments, monitor units, parameters isodose distributions compared. prostate lung mixing improved terms more important reduction for small incidences. Use high allows tissue sparing, while keeping similar coverage sensitive structures avoidance. Low contribution units usually increased Thus, tumors, can produce interesting dose low alone.

参考文章(47)
Gert De Meerleer*, Luc Vakaet*, Werner De Gersem, Geert Villeirs, Wilfried De Neve, Direct segment aperture and weight optimization for intensity-modulated radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Strahlentherapie Und Onkologie. ,vol. 180, pp. 136- 143 ,(2004) , 10.1007/S00066-004-1209-2
Christopher Fox, H Edwin Romeijn, Bart Lynch, Chunhua Men, Dionne M Aleman, James F Dempsey, Comparative analysis of 60Co intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Physics in Medicine and Biology. ,vol. 53, pp. 3175- 3188 ,(2008) , 10.1088/0031-9155/53/12/007
Michael Blomquist, Björn Zackrisson, Mikael Karlsson, Jinsheng Li, Chang-Ming Ma, Comparison between a conventional treatment energy and 50 MV photons for the treatment of lung tumours. Physics in Medicine and Biology. ,vol. 47, pp. 889- 897 ,(2002) , 10.1088/0031-9155/47/6/303
Indira Madani, Barbara Vanderstraeten, Samuel Bral, Marc Coghe, Werner De Gersem, Carlos De Wagter, Hubert Thierens, Wilfried De Neve, Comparison of 6 MV and 18 MV photons for IMRT treatment of lung cancer. Radiotherapy and Oncology. ,vol. 82, pp. 63- 69 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.RADONC.2006.11.016
Myriam Bouchard, Sylvain Nadeau, Luc Gingras, Paul-Émile Raymond, Frédéric Beaulieu, Luc Beaulieu, André Fortin, Isabelle Germain, Clinical Outcome of Adjuvant Treatment of Endometrial Cancer Using Aperture-Based Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. ,vol. 71, pp. 1343- 1350 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.IJROBP.2007.12.004
Alan C. Hartford, Andrzej Niemierko, Judith A. Adams, Marcia M. Urie, William U. Shipley, Conformal irradiation of the prostate: Estimating long-term rectal bleeding risk using dose-volume histograms International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. ,vol. 36, pp. 721- 730 ,(1996) , 10.1016/S0360-3016(96)00366-5
Andrea Pirzkall, Mark P Carol, Barby Pickett, Ping Xia, Mack Roach, Lynn J Verhey, The effect of beam energy and number of fields on photon-based IMRT for deep-seated targets. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. ,vol. 53, pp. 434- 442 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0360-3016(02)02750-5
Mark R Storey, Alan Pollack, Gunar Zagars, Lewis Smith, John Antolak, Isaac Rosen, Complications from radiotherapy dose escalation in prostate cancer: preliminary results of a randomized trial International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. ,vol. 48, pp. 635- 642 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00700-8
L BOERSMA, M VANDENBRINK, A BRUCE, T SHOUMAN, L GRAS, A TEVELDE, J LEBESQUE, Estimation of the incidence of late bladder and rectum complications after high-dose (70-78 GY) conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer, using dose-volume histograms. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. ,vol. 41, pp. 83- 92 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0360-3016(98)00037-6