A 3-year randomized trial of ropinirole and bromocriptine in early Parkinson’s disease

作者: A. D. Korczyn , E. R. Brunt , J. P. Larsen , Z. Nagy , W. H. Poewe

DOI: 10.1212/WNL.53.2.364

关键词: BromocriptineAnesthesiaClinical trialParkinson's diseaseDopamine agonistLevodopaPsychologyCentral nervous system diseaseRopiniroleRandomized controlled trial

摘要: Objective: To compare the long-term efficacy and safety of ropinirole with bromocriptine over 3 years in patients early PD limited or no previous dopaminergic therapy. Methods: In this prospective, double-blind, parallel-group study, 335 were randomized to 0.75 mg 1.25 titrated upward at weekly intervals—maximum permitted daily doses 24 ropinirole, 40 bromocriptine. Results: Approximately one third each group withdrew prematurely, mostly because adverse experiences; 61/102 (60%) ropinirole-treated 59/112 (53%) bromocriptine-treated completed study on dopamine agonist alone. Mean for all completion 12 (SD 6) 8) Occurrence experiences both groups was similar. Emergence dyskinesias low. Both treatments induced marked improvements Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale activities living (ADL, Part II) motor (Part III) scores first weeks, which maintained during study. After years, had a mean improvement score 31% compared 22% (p = 0.086) significantly better ADL (treatment difference 1.46 points, p 0.029). Conclusions: agonists are effective treatment high proportion patients; effectiveness persists least years. Those who functional status than

参考文章(15)
U. K. Rinne, F. Bracco, C. Chouza, E. Dupont, O. Gershanik, J. F. M. Masso, J. L. Montastruc, C. D. Marsden, A. Dubini, N. Orlando, R. Grimaldi, Cabergoline in the treatment of early parkinson's disease: Results of the first year of treatment in a double-blind comparison of cabergoline and levodopa Neurology. ,vol. 48, pp. 363- 368 ,(1997) , 10.1212/WNL.48.2.363
B. Bergamasco, P. Benna, L. Scarzella, Long‐term bromocriptine treatment of de novo patients with Parkinson's disease. A seven‐year follow‐up Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. ,vol. 81, pp. 383- 387 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1600-0404.1990.TB00980.X
Marcus Richards, Karen Marder, Lucien Cote, Richard Mayeux, Interrater reliability of the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale motor examination Movement Disorders. ,vol. 9, pp. 89- 91 ,(1994) , 10.1002/MDS.870090114
M A Hely, J G Morris, W G Reid, D J O'Sullivan, P M Williamson, D Rail, G A Broe, S Margrie, The Sydney Multicentre Study of Parkinson's disease: a randomised, prospective five year study comparing low dose bromocriptine with low dose levodopa-carbidopa. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. ,vol. 57, pp. 903- 910 ,(1994) , 10.1136/JNNP.57.8.903
R.J. Eden, B. Costall, A.M. Domeney, P.A. Gerrard, C.A. Harvey, M.E. Kelly, R.J. Naylor, D.A.A. Owen, A. Wright, Preclinical pharmacology of ropinirole (SK&F 101468-A) a novel dopamine D2 agonist. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior. ,vol. 38, pp. 147- 154 ,(1991) , 10.1016/0091-3057(91)90603-Y
W. Kantakamalakul, W. T. Ruyechan, J. Hay, Analysis of varicella-zoster virus promoter sequences Neurology. ,vol. 45, ,(1995) , 10.1212/WNL.45.12_SUPPL_8.S28
Olivier Rascol, David J Brooks, Ehrout R Brunt, Amos D Korczyn, Warner H Poewe, Fabrizzio Stocchi, None, Ropinirole in the treatment of early Parkinson's disease: A 6-month interim report of a 5-year levodopa-controlled study Movement Disorders. ,vol. 13, pp. 39- 45 ,(1998) , 10.1002/MDS.870130111
JL Montastruc, O Rascol, A Rascol, None, A randomised controlled study of bromocriptine versus levodopa in previously untreated Parkinsonian patients: a 3 year follow-up. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. ,vol. 52, pp. 773- 775 ,(1989) , 10.1136/JNNP.52.6.773