Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis

作者: Antonius Rohlmann , Nagananda K. Burra , Thomas Zander , Georg Bergmann

DOI: 10.1007/S00586-006-0292-8

关键词: Compression (physics)BiomechanicsLumbar vertebraeFixation (surgical)OrthodonticsFacet jointWeight-bearingShear forceMedicineImplantAnatomySurgeryOrthopedics and Sports Medicine

摘要: A bilateral dynamic stabilization device is assumed to alter favorable the movement and load transmission of a spinal segment without intention fusion that segment. Little known about effect posterior fixation on mechanical behavior lumbar spine. Muscle forces were disregarded in few biomechanical studies published. The aim this study was determine how loads are affected by implant compared rigid fixator which does not claim maintain mobility. paired monosegmental inserted at level L3/L4 validated finite element model Both healthy slightly degenerated disc level. Distraction bridged also simulated. For comparison, as well stiffness intersegmental rotation studied. loaded with upper body weight muscle simulate four loading cases standing, 30° flexion, 20° extension, 10° axial rotation. Intersegmental rotations, intradiscal pressure facet joint calculated adjacent above implant. Implant determined. Compared an intact spine, reduces level, decreases for extension With implant, these effects more pronounced. mildly increased strongly reduced extension. After distraction, values markedly only At L2/L3, has minor pressure. However, it increases Posterior implants mostly compression. Forces generally higher than both shear greater 1,000 N/mm similar those device, except after when considerably lower implants. Thus, results demonstrate necessarily reduce un-instrumented

参考文章(39)
Alan Gardner, Ketan C. Pande, Graf ligamentoplasty: a 7-year follow-up. European Spine Journal. ,vol. 11, pp. 101- 107 ,(2002) , 10.1007/S00586-002-0436-4
Robert C. Mulholland, Dilip K. Sengupta, Rationale, principles and experimental evaluation of the concept of soft stabilization European Spine Journal. ,vol. 11, pp. 142- 149 ,(2002) , 10.1007/S00586-002-0422-X
Antonius Rohlmann, Lars Bauer, Thomas Zander, Georg Bergmann, Hans-Joachim Wilke, Determination of trunk muscle forces for flexion and extension by using a validated finite element model of the lumbar spine and measured in vivo data. Journal of Biomechanics. ,vol. 39, pp. 981- 989 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.JBIOMECH.2005.02.019
A SHIRAZI-ADL, ABDUL M. AHMED, SURESH C. SHRIVASTAVA, Mechanical Response of a Lumbar Motion Segment in Axial Torque Alone and Combined with Compression Spine. ,vol. 11, pp. 914- 927 ,(1986) , 10.1097/00007632-198611000-00012
S. Seitsalo, D. Schlenzka, M. Poussa, K. Österman, Disc degeneration in young patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis treated operatively or conservatively: A long-term follow-up European Spine Journal. ,vol. 6, pp. 393- 397 ,(1997) , 10.1007/BF01834066
Avinash G. Patwardhan, Robert M. Havey, Kevin P. Meade, Brian Lee, Brian Dunlap, A follower load increases the load-carrying capacity of the lumbar spine in compression Spine. ,vol. 24, pp. 1003- 1009 ,(1999) , 10.1097/00007632-199905150-00014
Mark D. Rahm, Brad B. Hall, Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion with instrumentation: a retrospective study. Journal of Spinal Disorders. ,vol. 9, pp. 392- 400 ,(1996) , 10.1097/00002517-199610000-00005
Antonius Rohlmann, Thomas Zander, Georg Bergmann, Effect of total disc replacement with ProDisc on intersegmental rotation of the lumbar spine. Spine. ,vol. 30, pp. 738- 743 ,(2005) , 10.1097/01.BRS.0000157413.72276.C4