Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Myomectomy versus Abdominal Myomectomy for Large Myomas Sized over 10 cm or Weighing 250 g.

作者: Sa Ra Lee , Eun Sil Lee , Young-Jae Lee , Shin-Wha Lee , Jeong Yeol Park

DOI: 10.3349/YMJ.2020.61.12.1054

关键词: Hospital stayOperating timeMyomaMedicineLaparoscopic myomectomySurgeryPerioperativeBlood lossPelvic surgeryUterine myomectomy

摘要: PURPOSE Here, we compared the operative and perioperative outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy (RALM) abdominal (AM) in patients with large (>10 cm) or heavy myomas (>250 g). MATERIALS AND METHODS We included 278 who underwent multi-port RALM (n=126) AM (n=151) for a tertiary care hospital April 2019 June 2020. The t-test, chi-square, Bonferroni's test, multiple linear regression were used. RESULTS No differences observed age, body mass index, parity, history of pelvic surgery two groups. Myoma diameters not different (10.8±2.52 cm vs. 11.2±3.0 cm, p=0.233), but lighter group than (444.6±283.14 g 604.68±368.35 g, respectively, p=0.001). had higher proportion subserosal myomas, fewer over >3 longer total operating time. However, also shorter stay short-term complications. Estimated blood loss (EBL) was number removed most significant factor (coefficient=10.89, p<0.0001) affecting EBL. CONCLUSION is feasible technique even myomas. tend to have stays postoperative fevers within 48 hours. has

参考文章(24)
Elizabeth A. Stewart, Uterine Fibroids New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 372, pp. 1646- 1655 ,(2015) , 10.1056/NEJMCP1411029
John P. Judd, Nazema Y. Siddiqui, Jason C. Barnett, Anthony G. Visco, Laura J. Havrilesky, Jennifer M. Wu, Cost-Minimization Analysis of Robotic-Assisted, Laparoscopic, and Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. ,vol. 17, pp. 493- 499 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.JMIG.2010.03.011
J. Frederick, H. Fletcher, D. Simeon, A. Mullings, M. Hardie, Intramyometrial vasopressin as a haemostatic agent during myomectomy British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 101, pp. 435- 437 ,(1994) , 10.1111/J.1471-0528.1994.TB11918.X
Arnold P. Advincula, Xiao Xu, Suntrea Goudeau, Scott B. Ransom, Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: A comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. ,vol. 14, pp. 698- 705 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.JMIG.2007.06.008
Kelly N. Wright, Gudrun M. Jonsdottir, Selena Jorgensen, Neel Shah, Jon I. Einarsson, Costs and outcomes of abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomies. Jsls-journal of The Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. ,vol. 16, pp. 519- 524 ,(2012) , 10.4293/108680812X13462882736736
Ehab E. Barakat, Mohamed A. Bedaiwy, Stephen Zimberg, Benjamin Nutter, Mohsen Nosseir, Tommaso Falcone, Robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of surgical outcomes. Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 117, pp. 256- 266 ,(2011) , 10.1097/AOG.0B013E318207854F
Carrie E. Bedient, Javier F. Magrina, Brie N. Noble, Rosanne M. Kho, Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 201, pp. 566.e1- 566.e5 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.AJOG.2009.05.049
Hsin-Yi Cheng, Yi-Jen Chen, Peng-Hui Wang, Hsiao-Wen Tsai, Yen-Hou Chang, Nae-Fang Twu, Chi-Mou Juang, Huahsi Wu, Ming-Shyen Yen, Kuan-Chong Chao, Robotic-assisted laparoscopic complex myomectomy: a single medical center's experience. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 54, pp. 39- 42 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.TJOG.2014.11.004
Millie A. Behera, Creighton E. Likes, John P. Judd, Jason C. Barnett, Laura J. Havrilesky, Jennifer M. Wu, Cost analysis of abdominal, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted myomectomies. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. ,vol. 19, pp. 52- 57 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.JMIG.2011.09.007