Differentiating Stakeholder Theories

作者: John Kaler

DOI: 10.1023/A:1024794710899

关键词: Stakeholder analysisBusiness ethicsShareholderLaw and economicsStakeholder theoryStakeholderTypologyBusinessAccountabilityNormativePublic relations

摘要: Following on from work stakeholder identification, this paper constructs a typology of theories based the extent to which serving interests non-shareholders relative those shareholders is accepted as responsibility companies. A division into normative, descriptive, and instrumental rejected grounds that latter two designations refer second order rather than divisions within theory first designation which, for purposes business ethics, applies all theories. The crucial distinction between stockholder argued be their respective rejection acceptance role-specific responsibilities toward are `ultimate objective fulfilling'. From starting point, constructed using do not give priority over non-shareholders, posit perfect duties towards well shareholders, accept accountability shareholders.

参考文章(21)
John H. Kaler, George D. Chryssides, An Introduction to Business Ethics ,(1993)
Gilbert Ryle, The Concept of Mind ,(1949)
John Raymond Boatright, Ethics and the conduct of business ,(1992)
Eric W. Orts, Alan Strudler, The Ethical and Environmental Limits of Stakeholder Theory Business Ethics Quarterly. ,vol. 12, pp. 215- 233 ,(2002) , 10.2307/3857811
John Kaler, Responsibility, accountability and governance Business Ethics: A European Review. ,vol. 11, pp. 327- 334 ,(2002) , 10.1111/1467-8608.00292
R. Edward Freeman, R. Edward Freeman, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach ,(1984)
John Kaler, What’s the Good of Ethical Theory? Business Ethics: A European Review. ,vol. 8, pp. 206- 213 ,(1999) , 10.1111/1467-8608.00155
John Kaler, Discussion: Putting ethical theory in its place Business Ethics: A European Review. ,vol. 9, pp. 211- 217 ,(2000) , 10.1111/1467-8608.00192