An Evaluation of the Romanian Fruits and Vegetables Producers Access to Different Types of Common Agricultural Policy Instruments. Is there Any Real Consistency with the Policy Objectives?

作者: Nicu Marcu , Georgeta-Mădălina MEGHIȘAN , Ionel Mugurel Jitea , None

DOI: 10.15835/NBHA4319945

关键词: Common Agricultural PolicyEuropean unionConsistency (negotiation)BusinessAgricultural economicsGreenhouseRomanianPaymentProduction (economics)Policy objectivesAgronomy and Crop SciencePlant scienceHorticulture

摘要: Fruits and vegetables sectors are considered to be strategic in the European Union due to their contribution to a better human health. Among others positive effects, their intake increase reduce mortality and obesity, assuring in the same time harmonised development for young children. The present study thus focused to reveal the consistency of the measure implemented in the Common Agricultural Policy to support fruits and vegetables production in Romania in liaison with the policy objectives. The country is one of the main ten important European producers of horticultural products in terms of production volumes and acreage. Results showed that over the last seven years (2007-2014), the sectorial production drawbacks have not been ameliorated very much. Both sectors are dominated by small-size farms that can produce only seasonally and mainly for short-market chains. In the same time, the greenhouses area shrink to levels that made the country extremely dependent to imports especially for tomatoes. The analysis of the pillar one payments schemes revealed that the fruits and vegetables producers could have access to only one payment that was half from European averages. Moreover, almost half of the producers had low sizes that left them outside the eligible criteria. The measures designed for the second pillar also penalized producers through the selection criteria. These results showed that for Romania there was not a real consistency between the actual policy measures and the objectives assumed by policy makers. The future measures (2014-2020) seem to correct these negative findings being better tailored to the situation of the local fruits and vegetables producers.

参考文章(20)
Joern Fischer, Tibor Hartel, Tobias Kuemmerle, Conservation policy in traditional farming landscapes Conservation Letters. ,vol. 5, pp. 167- 175 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1755-263X.2012.00227.X
Nigel Swain, Agriculture ‘East of the Elbe’ and the Common Agricultural Policy Sociologia Ruralis. ,vol. 53, pp. 369- 389 ,(2013) , 10.1111/SORU.12016
Matthew Gorton, Carmen Hubbard, Lionel Hubbard, The Folly of European Union Policy Transfer: Why the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Does Not Fit Central and Eastern Europe Regional Studies. ,vol. 43, pp. 1305- 1317 ,(2009) , 10.1080/00343400802508802
Eric M. Bignal, David I. McCracken, Low-intensity farming systems in the conservation of the countryside Journal of Applied Ecology. ,vol. 33, pp. 413- 424 ,(1996) , 10.2307/2404973
R. Rabbinge, H.C. Van Latesteijn, Long-Term Options for Land Use in the European Community Agricultural Systems. ,vol. 40, pp. 195- 210 ,(1992) , 10.1016/0308-521X(92)90021-F
D MacDonald, J.R Crabtree, G Wiesinger, T Dax, N Stamou, P Fleury, J Gutierrez Lazpita, A Gibon, Agricultural abandonment in mountain areas of Europe: Environmental consequences and policy response Journal of Environmental Management. ,vol. 59, pp. 47- 69 ,(2000) , 10.1006/JEMA.1999.0335
Clare Hall, Alistair McVittie, Dominic Moran, What does the public want from agriculture and the countryside? A review of evidence and methods Journal of Rural Studies. ,vol. 20, pp. 211- 225 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.JRURSTUD.2003.08.004
Jules Pretty, Gert van der Bijl, Rachel Hine, Thomas L. Dobbs, Matthew Rayment, Christopher F. Mason, David Gee, Craig Brett, James I.L. Morison, Policy Challenges and Priorities for Internalizing the Externalities of Modern Agriculture Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. ,vol. 44, pp. 263- 283 ,(2001) , 10.1080/09640560120033740