The Effect of Discussion upon the Correctness of Group Decisions, when the Factor of Majority Influence is Allowed For
作者： Robert L. Thorndike
DOI: 10.1080/00224545.1938.9920036
关键词: Majority influence 、 Social psychology (sociology) 、 Correctness 、 Psychology 、 Factor (chord) 、 Group (mathematics) 、 Social psychology
摘要: (1938). The Effect of Discussion upon the Correctness Group Decisions, when Factor Majority Influence is Allowed For. Journal Social Psychology: Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 343-362.
sci-hub.se 参考文章(11)
G. B. Watson, Do groups think more efficiently than individuals The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. ,vol. 23, pp. 328- 336 ,(1928) , 10.1037/H0072661
K. Gordon, A Study of Esthetic Judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology. ,vol. 6, pp. 36- 43 ,(1923) , 10.1037/H0071285
A. Jenness, Social influences in the change of opinion. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. ,vol. 27, pp. 29- 34 ,(1932) , 10.1037/H0074336
K. Gordon, Group Judgments in the Field of Lifted Weights. Journal of Experimental Psychology. ,vol. 7, pp. 398- 400 ,(1924) , 10.1037/H0074666
M. H. Means, Fears of one thousand college women. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. ,vol. 31, pp. 291- 311 ,(1936) , 10.1037/H0063307
D. Wheeler, H. Jordan, Change of individual opinion to accord with group opinion The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. ,vol. 24, pp. 203- 206 ,(1929) , 10.1037/H0072732
Clare H. Marple, The Comparative Susceptibility of Three Age Levels to the Suggestion of Group versus Expert Opinion Journal of Social Psychology. ,vol. 4, pp. 176- 186 ,(1933) , 10.1080/00224545.1933.9921568
H. E. Burtt, Sex Differences in the Effect of Discussion. Journal of Experimental Psychology. ,vol. 3, pp. 390- 395 ,(1920) , 10.1037/H0072937
J. R. Stroop, Is the judgment of the group better than that of the average member of the group Journal of Experimental Psychology. ,vol. 15, pp. 550- 562 ,(1932) , 10.1037/H0070482
Henry T. Moore, The Comparative Influence of Majority and Expert Opinion The American Journal of Psychology. ,vol. 32, pp. 16- ,(1921) , 10.2307/1413472