Predicting the Future: Review of Public Perception Studies of Nanotechnology
作者： Michael Siegrist
DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2010.501255
关键词: Perception 、 Engineering ethics 、 Nanotechnology 、 Social science research 、 Psychology 、 Risk assessment 、 Risk perception
摘要: ABSTRACT Public perception may have a strong impact on the progress of nanotechnology. A comprehensive risk assessment should therefore take public into account. This article reviews social science research examining Factors that are important for shaping described, and applications could pose acceptance problems identified. Possibilities limits dealing with future nanotechnology discussed. Implications industry outlined.
cabdirect.org
sci-hub.se 参考文章(52)
Michael D. cobb, Jane Macoubrie, Public perceptions about nanotechnology: Risks, benefits and trust Journal of Nanoparticle Research. ,vol. 6, pp. 395- 405 ,(2004) , 10.1007/S11051-004-3394-4
P. Rozin, The Meaning of “Natural” Process More Important Than Content Psychological Science. ,vol. 16, pp. 652- 658 ,(2005) , 10.1111/J.1467-9280.2005.01589.X
John C. Besley, Victoria L. Kramer, Qingjiang Yao, Chris Toumey, Interpersonal discussion following citizen engagement about nanotechnology: What, if anything, do they say? Science Communication. ,vol. 30, pp. 209- 235 ,(2008) , 10.1177/1075547008324670
Niall O'Brien, Enda Cummins, Recent Developments in Nanotechnology and Risk Assessment Strategies for Addressing Public and Environmental Health Concerns Human and Ecological Risk Assessment. ,vol. 14, pp. 568- 592 ,(2008) , 10.1080/10807030802074261
Michael D. Mehta, From Biotechnology to Nanotechnology: What Can We Learn from Earlier Technologies? Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. ,vol. 24, pp. 34- 39 ,(2004) , 10.1177/0270467604263119
O. M. Castellini, G. K. Walejko, C. E. Holladay, T. J. Theim, G. M. Zenner, W. C. Crone, Nanotechnology and the public: Effectively communicating nanoscale science and engineering concepts Journal of Nanoparticle Research. ,vol. 9, pp. 183- 189 ,(2007) , 10.1007/S11051-006-9160-Z
Carl A. Batt, Anna M. Waldron, Natalie Broadwater, Numbers, scale and symbols: the public understanding of nanotechnology Journal of Nanoparticle Research. ,vol. 10, pp. 1141- 1148 ,(2008) , 10.1007/S11051-007-9344-1
Dominique Brossard, Dietram A. Scheufele, Eunkyung Kim, Bruce V. Lewenstein, Religiosity as a perceptual filter: examining processes of opinion formation about nanotechnology Public Understanding of Science. ,vol. 18, pp. 546- 558 ,(2009) , 10.1177/0963662507087304
Aasgeir Helland, Martin Scheringer, Michael Siegrist, Hans G. Kastenholz, Arnim Wiek, Roland W. Scholz, Risk Assessment of Engineered Nanomaterials: A Survey of Industrial Approaches Environmental Science & Technology. ,vol. 42, pp. 640- 646 ,(2008) , 10.1021/ES062807I
Lennart Sjöberg, Perceived risk and tampering with nature Journal of Risk Research. ,vol. 3, pp. 353- 367 ,(2000) , 10.1080/13669870050132568