Shear bond strength of luting agents to fixed prosthodontic restorative core materials.

作者: N Capa , Z Özkurt , C Canpolat , E Kazazoglu

DOI: 10.1111/J.1834-7819.2009.01159.X

关键词: TitaniumGlass ionomer cementAdhesiveCementBond strengthDentistryCrossheadComposite numberMaterials scienceCubic zirconiaComposite material

摘要: Background:  Bonding properties of luting cements are important for retention restorative core materials. The aim this study was to compare the bonding performance a resin-modified glass ionomer cement and self-adhesive resin various fixed prosthodontic materials. Methods:  Cylindrical specimens with thickness 2 mm diameter 5 mm were fabricated from Au-Pd-Ag, Co-Cr, Ni-Cr-Mo, Ni-Cr-Fe alloys, titanium, zirconia Empress II (n = 20). Each group divided into two subgroups be luted different agents. Composite blocks cemented onto RelyXUnicem FujiCem. A shear bond strength machine 50 kg load cell 0.50 mm/min crosshead speed used. Kruskal Wallis test, Dunn’s Multiple Range test Mann-Whitney-U used statistical analysis. results evaluated in confidence interval p < 0.05. Results:  highest obtained between Ni-Cr-Fe-RelyXUnicem (8.22 ± 2.15 MPa) lowest II-FujiCem (1.48 ± 0.9 MPa). In FujiCem groups, Co-Cr showed significantly higher than Au-Pd-Ag II. RelyX Unicem II. Conclusions:  types agents materials may have significant influence on strength.

参考文章(28)
Deniz Sen, Emine Nayir, Selim Pamuk, Comparison of the tensile bond strength of high-noble, noble, and base metal alloys bonded to enamel. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. ,vol. 84, pp. 561- 566 ,(2000) , 10.1067/MPR.2000.110265
Jeffrey M. Swartz, Richard D. Davis, Johnnie D. Overton, Tensile bond strength of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement to microabraded and silica-coated or tin-plated high noble ceramic alloy Journal of Prosthodontics. ,vol. 9, pp. 195- 200 ,(2000) , 10.1111/J.1532-849X.2000.00195.X
W.Frank Caughman, Daniel C.N. Chan, Frederick A. Rueggeberg, Curing potential of dual-polymerizable resin cements in simulated clinical situations. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. ,vol. 85, pp. 479- 484 ,(2001) , 10.1067/MPR.2001.114842
Jose de la Macorra, Guillermo Pradíes, Conventional and adhesive luting cements Clinical Oral Investigations. ,vol. 6, pp. 198- 204 ,(2002) , 10.1007/S00784-002-0184-1
J. Robert Kelly, Stephen D. Campbell, H. Kent Bowen, Fracture-surface analysis of dental ceramics Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. ,vol. 62, pp. 536- 541 ,(1989) , 10.1016/0022-3913(89)90075-9
Ana M. Diaz-Arnold, Marcos A. Vargas, Debra R. Haselton, Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. ,vol. 81, pp. 135- 141 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70240-4
A.D. Wilson, H.J. Prosser, D.M. Powis, Mechanism of Adhesion of Polyelectrolyte Cements to Hydroxyapatite Journal of Dental Research. ,vol. 62, pp. 590- 592 ,(1983) , 10.1177/00220345830620051801
Mark S. Scurria, James D. Bader, Daniel A. Shugars, Meta-analysis of fixed partial denture survival: Prostheses and abutments Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. ,vol. 79, pp. 459- 464 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70162-3
Stephen F. Rosenstiel, Martin F. Land, Bruce J. Crispin, Dental luting agents: A review of the current literature Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. ,vol. 80, pp. 280- 301 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70128-3