Change in Tumor Size by RECIST Correlates Linearly With Overall Survival in Phase I Oncology Studies

作者: Rajul K. Jain , J. Jack Lee , Chaan Ng , David Hong , Jing Gong

DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.4752

关键词: Overall survivalTumor sizeCorrelationProgressive diseaseProportional hazards modelMedicineInternal medicineStable DiseaseOncologyClinical trialKaplan-Meier Estimate

摘要: Purpose RECIST is used to quantify tumor changes during exposure to anticancer agents. Responses are categorized as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD). Clinical trials dictate a patient's management options based on the category into which his or her response falls. However, the association between response and survival is not well studied in the early trial setting. Patients and Methods To study the correlation between response as quantified by RECIST and overall survival (OS, the gold-standard survival outcome), we analyzed 570 participants of 24 phase I trials conducted between October 2004 and May 2009, of whom 468 had quantifiable changes in tumor size. Analyses of Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS by response and null Martingale residuals of Cox models were the primary outcome measures. All analyses are landmark analyses. Results Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed strong associations between change in tumor size by RECIST and survival (P = 4.5 × 10−6 to < 1 × 10−8). The relationship was found to be near-linear (R2 = 0.75 to 0.92) and confirmed by the residual analyses. No clear inflection points were found to exist in the relationship between tumor size changes and survival. Conclusion RECIST quantification of response correlates with survival, validating RECIST's use in phase I trials. However, the lack of apparent boundary values in the relationship between change in tumor size and OS demonstrates the arbitrary nature of the CR/PR/SD/PD categories and questions emphasis placed on this categorization scheme. Describing tumor responses as a continuous variable may be more informative than reporting categoric responses when evaluating novel anticancer therapies.

参考文章(35)
Jordi Llinares, A regulatory overview about rare diseases. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. ,vol. 686, pp. 193- 207 ,(2010) , 10.1007/978-90-481-9485-8_12
Wm. Kevin Kelly, Susan Halabi, Oncology clinical trials : successful design, conduct, and analysis Demos Medical. ,(2010)
Marc E. Buyse, Elizabeth A Eisenhauer, Christopher Twelves, Phase I Cancer Clinical Trials: A Practical Guide ,(2006)
Christopher K. Daugherty, Ethical issues in the development of new agents. Investigational New Drugs. ,vol. 17, pp. 145- 153 ,(1999) , 10.1023/A:1006371200296
Alampady Krishna Prasad Shanbhogue, Anand B. Karnad, Srinivasa R. Prasad, Tumor Response Evaluation in Oncology Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. ,vol. 34, pp. 479- 484 ,(2010) , 10.1097/RCT.0B013E3181DB2670
Daniel M. Lane, Reporting Results From Chemotherapy Trials JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. ,vol. 253, pp. 2364- 2364 ,(1985) , 10.1001/JAMA.1985.03350400045013
Glen J. Weiss, Mitesh J. Borad, Christine L. Hann, Julie R. Brahmer, Howard M. Mackey, Bertram L. Lum, Walter C. Darbonne, James C. Marsters, Frederic J. de Sauvage, Jennifer A. Low, Daniel D. Von Hoff, Patricia M. LoRusso, Charles M. Rudin, Josina C. Reddy, Robert L. Yauch, Raoul Tibes, Inhibition of the Hedgehog Pathway in Advanced Basal-Cell Carcinoma New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 361, pp. 1164- 1172 ,(2009) , 10.1056/NEJMOA0905360
M. Markman, The needs of science vs the needs of patients: ethical concerns in cancer clinical trials. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 70, pp. 1008- 1009 ,(2003) , 10.3949/CCJM.70.12.1008
William S. Cleveland, Susan J. Devlin, Locally Weighted Regression: An Approach to Regression Analysis by Local Fitting Journal of the American Statistical Association. ,vol. 83, pp. 596- 610 ,(1988) , 10.1080/01621459.1988.10478639
E.A. Eisenhauer, P. Therasse, J. Bogaerts, L.H. Schwartz, D. Sargent, R. Ford, J. Dancey, S. Arbuck, S. Gwyther, M. Mooney, L. Rubinstein, L. Shankar, L. Dodd, R. Kaplan, D. Lacombe, J. Verweij, New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) European Journal of Cancer. ,vol. 45, pp. 228- 247 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.EJCA.2008.10.026