Computer-Based Symptom Assessment Is Feasible in Patients With Advanced Cancer: Results From an International Multicenter Study, the EPCRC-CSA

作者: Marianne Jensen Hjermstad , Hanne C Lie , Augusto Caraceni , David C Currow , Robin L Fainsinger

DOI: 10.1016/J.JPAINSYMMAN.2011.10.025

关键词: DiscontinuationYoung adultHealth carePhysical therapyNorwegianPalliative careComputer technologyPerformance statusRandomized controlled trialMedicine

摘要: Abstract Context Symptom assessment by computers is only effective if it provides valid results and perceived as useful for clinical use the end users: patients health care providers. Objectives To identify factors associated with discontinuation, time expenditure, patient preferences of computerized symptom used in an international multicenter data collection project: European Palliative Care Research Collaborative-Computerized Assessment. Methods Cancer incurable metastatic or locally advanced disease were recruited from 17 centers eight countries, providing 1017 records analyses. Observer-based registrations patient-reported measures on pain, depression, physical function entered touch screen laptop computers. Results The entire was completed 94.9% ( n =965), median age 63 years (range 18–91 years) Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score 70 20–100). Predictive noncompletion higher age, lower KPS, more pain P ≤0.012). Time expenditure among completers increased male gender, Norwegian nationality, number comorbidities, functioning ≤0.007) but inversely related to levels tiredness ≤0.03). Need assistance predicted nationality other than Norwegian, educational level Conclusion high completion rate shows that feasible cancer. However, reduced performance status reduces compliance increases need assistance. Future work should aim at identifying minimum set screening questions refine software optimize reduce respondent burden frail patients.

参考文章(46)
Baker Jp, Mendelson Ra, Johnston N, Whittaker S, McLaughlin, Jeejeebhoy Kn, Detsky As, What is subjective global assessment of nutritional status? 1987. Classical article. Nutricion Hospitalaria. ,vol. 23, pp. 400- ,(2008)
Alain Abran, Adel Khelifi, Witold Suryn, Ahmed Seffah, Usability Meanings and Interpretations in ISO Standards Software Quality Journal. ,vol. 11, pp. 325- 338 ,(2003) , 10.1023/A:1025869312943
Eduardo Bruera, Norma Kuehn, Melvin J. Miller, Pal Selmser, Karen Macmillan, The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. Journal of Palliative Care. ,vol. 7, pp. 6- 9 ,(1991) , 10.1177/082585979100700202
G. Velikova, E. P. Wright, A. B. Smith, A. Cull, A. Gould, D. Forman, T. Perren, M. Stead, J. Brown, P. J. Selby, Automated Collection of Quality-of-Life Data: A Comparison of Paper and Computer Touch-Screen Questionnaires Journal of Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 17, pp. 998- 1007 ,(1999) , 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.3.998
Marshal F. Folstein, Susan E. Folstein, Paul R. McHugh, “Mini-mental state” Journal of Psychiatric Research. ,vol. 12, pp. 189- 198 ,(1975) , 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
Janet S Carpenter, Susan Rawl, Jennifer Porter, Karen Schmidt, Jennifer Tornatta, Foluso Ojewole, Paul Helft, David A Potter, Christopher Sweeney, R Brian Giesler, None, Oncology outpatient and provider responses to a computerized symptom assessment system. Oncology Nursing Forum. ,vol. 35, pp. 661- 669 ,(2008) , 10.1188/08/ONF.661-669
Adam C Carle, David Cella, Li Cai, Seung W Choi, Paul K Crane, S McKay Curtis, Jonathan Gruhl, Jin-Shei Lai, Shubhabrata Mukherjee, Steven P Reise, Jeanne A Teresi, David Thissen, Eric J Wu, Ron D Hays, Advancing PROMIS's methodology: results of the Third Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(®)) Psychometric Summit. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research. ,vol. 11, pp. 677- 684 ,(2011) , 10.1586/ERP.11.74
Shinichi Nakagawa, A farewell to Bonferroni: the problems of low statistical power and publication bias Behavioral Ecology. ,vol. 15, pp. 1044- 1045 ,(2004) , 10.1093/BEHECO/ARH107