The Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning for Low- and High-Achieving Students Using an Integrated Learning System.

作者: Thomas A. Brush

DOI:

关键词: Computer labStandardized testOpen learningBlended learningCooperative learningMathematics educationEducational technologyComputer scienceLearning developmentExperiential learning

摘要: In recent years, many schools have turned to Integraed Learning Systems (ILSs) facilitate instruction and assist with raising state standardized test scores. Typically, these ILSs are utilized in a computer lab students working individually on computer-based instructional lessons for an allotted time period. Using this manner has created problems such as increasing anxiety, hostility, boredom students. Through the integration of cooperative learning ILS delivery, some could be alleviated. This study examined achievement behavior differences between elementary school completing activities traditional, individualized format, same groups. was order determine if model used effectively mathematics lab-based ILS. addition, aimed discern strategy more effective high or low academic ability levels. Achievement attitudinal data were collected all fifth grade selected prior experiment at end treatment Results revealed that using performed better tests attitudes positive when they completed (Contains 38 references.) (Author/AEF) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS best can made * from original document. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Of hoe EOUCatiOnal Research improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) O document been reproduced received person organization originating it. Minor changes improve reproduction quality. Points view opinions stated do not necessarily represent official OERI position policy.

参考文章(13)
Ronald Tyrrell, What Teachers Say about Cooperative Learning Middle School Journal. ,vol. 21, pp. 16- 19 ,(1990) , 10.1080/00940771.1990.11495058
Philip V. Bender, The Effectiveness of Integrated Computer Learning Systems in the Elementary School. Contemporary Education. ,vol. 63, pp. 19- 23 ,(1991)
Shari Robinson, Integrated Learning Systems: From Teacher-Proof to Teacher Empowering. Contemporary Education. ,vol. 63, pp. 15- 18 ,(1991)
Mark R. Lepper, Microcomputers in education: Motivational and social issues. American Psychologist. ,vol. 40, pp. 1- 18 ,(1985) , 10.1037/0003-066X.40.1.1
Henry Jay Becker, Mindless or mindful use of integrated learning systems International Journal of Educational Research. ,vol. 21, pp. 65- 79 ,(1994) , 10.1016/0883-0355(94)90024-8
Simon Hooper, Chanchai Temiyakarn, Michael D. Williams, The effects of cooperative learning and learner control on high- and average-ability students Educational Technology Research and Development. ,vol. 41, pp. 5- 18 ,(1993) , 10.1007/BF02297309
Simon Hooper, Cooperative Learning and Computer-Based Instruction Educational Technology Research and Development. ,vol. 40, pp. 21- 38 ,(1992) , 10.1007/BF02296840
Simon Hooper, Michael J. Hannafin, The effects of group composition on achievement, interaction, and learning efficiency during computer-based cooperative instruction Educational Technology Research and Development. ,vol. 39, pp. 27- 40 ,(1991) , 10.1007/BF02296436
Neil Davidson, Diana Lambdin Kroll, An Overview of Research on Cooperative Learning Related to Mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. ,vol. 22, pp. 362- 365 ,(1991) , 10.5951/JRESEMATHEDUC.22.5.0362