Symposium commentary: Reflections on the theory of deliberative systems
作者： John S. Dryzek
DOI: 10.1080/19460171.2016.1170620
关键词: Strengths and weaknesses 、 Epistemology 、 Field (Bourdieu) 、 Political science 、 Deliberative democracy 、 Corporate governance 、 Public administration
摘要: ABSTRACTI address some of the strengths and weaknesses deliberative systems approach identified by contributors to this special issue on theory systems. Their contributions signal significant advance in approach. These papers show once again that democracy as a field is very good at recognizing remedying its own shortcomings, well reformulating itself response critics.
core.ac.uk
sci-hub.se 参考文章(6)
Jane Mansbridge, James Bohman, Simone Chambers, Thomas Christiano, Archon Fung, John Parkinson, Dennis F. Thompson, Mark E. Warren, A systemic approach to deliberative democracy Deliberative Systems. pp. 1- 26 ,(2012) , 10.1017/CBO9781139178914.002
Thomas Christiano, Rational deliberation among experts and citizens Deliberative Systems. pp. 27- 51 ,(2012) , 10.1017/CBO9781139178914.003
RICHARD B. NORGAARD, Finding Hope in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Conservation Biology. ,vol. 22, pp. 862- 869 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1523-1739.2008.00922.X
Charles E. Lindblom, The Market as Prison The Journal of Politics. ,vol. 44, pp. 324- 336 ,(1982) , 10.2307/2130588
Carolyn M. Hendriks, Integrated Deliberation: Reconciling Civil Society's Dual Role in Deliberative Democracy: Political Studies. ,vol. 54, pp. 486- 508 ,(2006) , 10.1111/J.1467-9248.2006.00612.X
Douglas Torgerson, Between knowledge and politics: Three faces of policy analysis Policy Sciences. ,vol. 19, pp. 33- 59 ,(1986) , 10.1007/BF02124483