Correlates of time to approval and other clinical development periods.

作者: Christopher D. Breder , Margaret VanHeusen , Lin-Chau Chang

DOI: 10.1016/J.DRUDIS.2019.05.027

关键词: Large populationMedicineDrugDrug developmentDuration (project management)Phase (combat)MEDLINEIntensive care medicine

摘要: The drug development cycle is classically divided into a clinical phase and review phase, with the typically being further partitioned based on planning conduct of adequate well controlled trials. Factors affecting duration intervals have not previously been systematically investigated. Here, we analyze large population (N=825) New Drug Applications (NDAs) approved between 2008 2017 to characterize typical these factors associated their duration. These data analyses will help those involved in pharmaceutical by enabling data-driven providing insight effect certain programs.

参考文章(7)
Shunsuke Ono, Chisato Yoshioka, Orie Asaka, Koji Tamura, Taro Shibata, Kazuyuki Saito, New drug approval times and clinical evidence in Japan. Contemporary Clinical Trials. ,vol. 26, pp. 660- 672 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.CCT.2005.07.003
J DiMasi, Risks in new drug development: approval success rates for investigational drugs. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. ,vol. 69, pp. 297- 307 ,(2001) , 10.1067/MCP.2001.115446
Jacob Cohen, A power primer. Psychological Bulletin. ,vol. 112, pp. 155- 159 ,(1992) , 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
Adria Tyndall, Wenny Du, Christopher D. Breder, Regulatory watch: The target product profile as a tool for regulatory communication: advantageous but underused Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. ,vol. 16, pp. 156- 156 ,(2017) , 10.1038/NRD.2016.264
Christopher D. Breder, Wenny Du, Adria Tyndall, What's the Regulatory Value of a Target Product Profile? Trends in Biotechnology. ,vol. 35, pp. 576- 579 ,(2017) , 10.1016/J.TIBTECH.2017.02.011
Lin-Chau Chang, Margaret Vanheusen, Xiao Fang, Christopher D. Breder, Identification of factors associated with first-cycle drug approval rates and regulatory outcomes for new drug applications. Pharmacological Research. ,vol. 139, pp. 166- 172 ,(2019) , 10.1016/J.PHRS.2018.11.004
Kenneth I. Kaitin, Michael Manocchia, Mark Seibring, Louis Lasagna, The new drug approvals of 1990, 1991, and 1992: trends in drug development. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. ,vol. 34, pp. 120- 127 ,(1994) , 10.1002/J.1552-4604.1994.TB03975.X