MUPOM: A multi-criteria multi-period outranking method for decision-making in sustainable development context
作者： Anissa Frini , Sarah Ben Amor
DOI: 10.1016/J.EIAR.2018.11.002
关键词: Economic efficiency 、 Social equality 、 Sustainable forest management 、 Pairwise comparison 、 Multi period 、 Sustainable development 、 Compromise 、 Risk analysis (engineering) 、 Context (language use) 、 Computer science
摘要: Abstract This article aims to support decision-making in sustainable development context, which must guarantee a long-term balance between environmental integrity, social equality and economic efficiency. It proposes temporal outranking method, named MUPOM (MUlti-criteria multi-Period Outranking Method), accommodates the requirements of demonstrates how paradigm behind methods can be use processing impacts decisions. The proposed method is structured four phases: multi-criteria aggregation, exploitation follow-up. considers conflicting incommensurable criteria, based on pairwise comparison, semi-compensatory, makes thresholds. provides valuable contributions for researchers practitioners dealing with SD context. was applied case study select best compromise forest management option, while considering impacts, benefits decision-maker preferences. Results show applicability real-world problems its outcomes.
sci-hub.se 参考文章(177)
JosÉ Figueira, Salvatore Greco, Matthias Ehrogott, Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys Operations Research and Management Science. ,(2005) , 10.1007/B100605
Rui Manuel de Sousa Fragoso, Management of Mediterranean forests — A compromise programming approach considering different stakeholders and different objectives Forest Policy and Economics. ,vol. 57, pp. 38- 46 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.FORPOL.2015.03.012
Kourosh Behzadian, Zoran Kapelan, Advantages of integrated and sustainability based assessment for metabolism based strategic planning of urban water systems. Science of The Total Environment. ,vol. 527, pp. 220- 231 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2015.04.097
Petra Grošelj, Donald G. Hodges, Lidija Zadnik Stirn, Participatory and multi-criteria analysis for forest (ecosystem) management: a case study of Pohorje, Slovenia. Forest Policy and Economics. ,vol. 71, pp. 80- 86 ,(2016) , 10.1016/J.FORPOL.2015.05.006
Joseph Buongiorno, J. Keith Gilless, Decision Methods for Forest Resource Management ,(2003)
Emma Mulliner, Naglis Malys, Vida Maliene, Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability Omega-international Journal of Management Science. ,vol. 59, pp. 146- 156 ,(2016) , 10.1016/J.OMEGA.2015.05.013
María Molinos-Senante, Trinidad Gómez, Rafael Caballero, Francesc Hernández-Sancho, Ramón Sala-Garrido, Assessment of wastewater treatment alternatives for small communities: An analytic network process approach Science of The Total Environment. ,vol. 532, pp. 676- 687 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2015.06.059
Hepu Deng, Multicriteria analysis for benchmarking sustainability development Benchmarking: An International Journal. ,vol. 22, pp. 791- 807 ,(2015) , 10.1108/BIJ-07-2013-0072
Kyle Eyvindson, Annika Kangas, Using a Compromise Programming Framework to Integrating Spatially Specific Preference Information for Forest Management Problems Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. ,vol. 22, pp. 3- 15 ,(2015) , 10.1002/MCDA.1529
Thomas Lorie Saaty, The analytic hierarchy process : planning, priority setting, resource allocation ,(1980)