Antibiotic prophylaxis for surgery for proximal femoral and other closed long bone fractures

作者: William J Gillespie , Geert HIM Walenkamp

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000244.PUB2

关键词: Clinical trialHip fractureAntibiotic prophylaxisCochrane LibraryRelative riskSurgeryFracture fixationInternal fixationArthroplastyMedicine

摘要: Background Surgical site infection and other hospital-acquired infections cause significant morbidity after internal fixation of fractures. The administration antibiotics may reduce the frequency infections. Objectives To determine whether prophylactic in people undergoing surgical management hip or closed long bone fractures reduces incidence infections. Search methods We searched Cochrane Bone, Joint Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (December 2009), Central Controlled Trials (The Library 2009, Issue 4), MEDLINE (1950 to November EMBASE (1988 December electronic databases including WHO International Clinical Registry Platform conferences proceedings reference lists articles. Selection criteria Randomised quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing any regimen systemic antibiotic prophylaxis administered at time surgery, compared with no prophylaxis, placebo, a different duration, fracture surgery for prosthetic replacement, fixation. All needed report infection. Data collection analysis Two authors independently screened papers inclusion, assessed risk bias extracted data. Pooled data are presented graphically. Main results Data from 8447 participants 23 studies were included analyses. In fixation, single dose significantly reduced deep (risk ratio 0.40, 95% CI 0.24 0.67), superficial infections, urinary respiratory tract infections. Multiple had an effect similar size on 0.35, 0.19 0.62), but effects not confirmed. Although many as reported was unclear, sensitivity analysis showed that removal meta-analyses high did alter conclusions. Economic modelling using one large trial indicated ceftriaxone is cost-effective intervention. Data adverse very limited, expected they appeared be more common those receiving antibiotics, placebo prophylaxis. Authors' conclusions Antibiotic should offered

参考文章(78)
Laurent Le, Antila P, Visuri T, A comparison of dicloxacillin and ampicillin in the antibiotic prophylaxis of total hip replacement. Annales Chirurgiae Et Gynaecologiae. ,vol. 65, pp. 58- 61 ,(1976)
Nirhamo J, Kytõmaa J, Jokipii P, Honkanen P, Sihvonen R, Pekkanen A, Sinisaari I, Aho H, Tulikoura I, Valtonen, Rimpiläinen J, Lüthje P, Nurmi I, Kataja M, Single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in osteosynthesis for hip fractures. A clinical multicentre study in Finland. Annales Chirurgiae Et Gynaecologiae. ,vol. 89, pp. 125- 130 ,(2000)
Karachalios T, Sapkas G, Lyritis G, Hatzopoulos E, Single-dose prophylaxis of ceftriaxone versus standard dosage of cefotaxime in the prophylaxis of bacterial complications in orthopedic surgery. Chemioterapia : international journal of the Mediterranean Society of Chemotherapy. ,vol. 6, pp. 573- ,(1987)
J Mäkijärvi, T Tuominen, J P Kaukonen, E Kemppainen, One dose cefuroxime prophylaxis in hip fracture surgery. Annales Chirurgiae Et Gynaecologiae. ,vol. 84, pp. 417- 419 ,(1995)
ALAN PAVEL, ROBERT L SMITH, ANTHONY BALLARD, IVAR J. LARSON, Prophylactic antibiotics in elective orthopedic surgery: a prospective study of 1,591 cases. Southern Medical Journal. pp. 50- ,(1977) , 10.1097/00007611-197710001-00015
D R Mauerhan, C L Nelson, D L Smith, R H Fitzgerald, T G Slama, R W Petty, R E Jones, R P Evans, Prophylaxis against infection in total joint arthroplasty. One day of cefuroxime compared with three days of cefazolin. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume. ,vol. 76, pp. 39- 45 ,(1994) , 10.2106/00004623-199401000-00006
R Buckley, G N Hughes, S A Huchcroft, T Snodgrass, Perioperative cefazolin prophylaxis in hip fracture surgery. Canadian Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 33, pp. 122- 127 ,(1990)
K. P. Schulitz, W. Winkelmann, B. Schoening, The prophylactic use of antibiotics in alloarthroplasty of the hip joint for coxarthrosis. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. ,vol. 96, pp. 79- 82 ,(1980) , 10.1007/BF00433285
Julian PT Higgins, Douglas G Altman, Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. pp. 187- 241 ,(2008) , 10.1002/9780470712184.CH8