Diagnostic accuracy of intraoral photographic orthodontic records.

作者: Tate H. Jackson , Christopher J. Kirk , Ceib Phillips , Lorne D. Koroluk

DOI: 10.1111/JERD.12426

关键词: Diagnostic accuracyOrthodonticsClinical photographyMedicinePhotography

摘要: OBJECTIVE The aims of this study were (1) to investigate how relevant intraoral photographs are contemporary orthodontic diagnosis and (2) assess orthodontists' ability accurately diagnose angle classification dental midlines using standardized photographs. METHODS Study participants orthodontists who completed a survey regarding photography protocols their use for diagnosis. Each participant was randomized complete 1 visual diagnostic task either or midlines. Accuracy compared across groups camera angulations. RESULTS In all, 80% 192 respondents reported clinic notes plan treatment; 50% also included casts. For the task, accuracy judging molar canine 79.9% 51.3%, respectively with ideal As angulation deviated, decreased significantly (P < 0.0001). midline direction deviation small change yet increased large (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS When alone relationships, is not likely be greater than 80%. becomes less ideal, by 15 degrees when 4 midlines, decrease. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE clinician wants have most accurate records, our results suggest that intra-oral photos may adequate it comes occlusal relationships such as esthetic parameters like little decrease significantly. Understanding these limitations will allow clinicians improve both clinical technique skills.

参考文章(11)
Jonathan Sandler, Joe Dwyer, Vincent Kokich, Fiona McKeown, Alison Murray, Richard McLaughlin, Catherine O'Brien, Paul O'Malley, Quality of clinical photographs taken by orthodontists, professional photographers, and orthodontic auxiliaries American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. ,vol. 135, pp. 657- 662 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.AJODO.2007.04.038
Jonathan Sandler, Rodrigo J. Gutierrez, Alison Murray, Clinical photographs: the gold standard, an update. Progress in Orthodontics. ,vol. 13, pp. 296- 303 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.PIO.2011.12.002
Jeff Berndt, Paola Leone, Gregory King, Using teledentistry to provide interceptive orthodontic services to disadvantaged children American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. ,vol. 134, pp. 700- 706 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.AJODO.2007.12.023
Ron Goodlin, Photographic-Assisted Diagnosis and Treatment Planning Dental Clinics of North America. ,vol. 55, pp. 211- 227 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.CDEN.2011.02.001
H. F. McKeown, A. M. Murray, P. J. Sandler, How to avoid common errors in clinical photography Journal of Orthodontics. ,vol. 32, pp. 43- 54 ,(2005) , 10.1179/146531205225020880
J. Richard Landis, Gary G. Koch, The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data Biometrics. ,vol. 33, pp. 159- 174 ,(1977) , 10.2307/2529310
N. A. Mandall, Are photographic records reliable for orthodontic screening Journal of Orthodontics. ,vol. 29, pp. 125- 128 ,(2002) , 10.1093/ORTHO/29.2.125
Cecilia Goracci, Lorenzo Franchi, Alessandro Vichi, Marco Ferrari, Accuracy, reliability, and efficiency of intraoral scanners for full-arch impressions: a systematic review of the clinical evidence European Journal of Orthodontics. ,vol. 38, pp. 422- 428 ,(2016) , 10.1093/EJO/CJV077
Tim Joda, Andreas Ender, Philipp Müller, Joannis Katsoulis, Joannis Katsoulis, Impact of digital intraoral scan strategies on the impression accuracy using the TRIOS Pod scanner. Quintessence International. ,vol. 47, pp. 343- 349 ,(2016) , 10.3290/J.QI.A35524
Mônica L. C. Aragón, Luana F. Pontes, Lívia M. Bichara, Carlos Flores-Mir, David Normando, Validity and reliability of intraoral scanners compared to conventional gypsum models measurements: a systematic review. European Journal of Orthodontics. ,vol. 38, pp. 429- 434 ,(2016) , 10.1093/EJO/CJW033