Translating Research into Policy : New Guidelines for Communicating Rights to Non-Native Speakers
作者： Aneta Pavlenko , Diane Eades
DOI:
关键词: Point (typography) 、 Justice (ethics) 、 Political science 、 Public relations 、 Jurisdiction 、 Common law 、 Interpreter 、 International communication 、 Psychological research
摘要: The purpose of this article is to introduce the Guidelines for communicating rights non-native speakers English in Australia, England and Wales, USA. guidelines were authored by international Communication Rights group (CoRG) that brought together 21 linguists, psychologists, lawyers, lawyer-linguists interpreters. intention was “translate” research on communication police interviews practitioners policy makers. Drawing linguistic psychological research, as well our collective experience working with specic cases, CoRG produced a 2000-word document seven recommendations, an explanation accessible ocers, judges justice administrators, bibliography relevant research. explains why project restricted three common law countries, encourages others consider using document, following article, starting point similar development their own country or jurisdiction.
up.pt参考文章(4)
Richard Rogers, Amor A. Correa, Lisa L. Hazelwood, Daniel W. Shuman, Raquel C. Hoersting, Hayley L. Blackwood, Spanish translations of Miranda warnings and the totality of the circumstances. Law and Human Behavior. ,vol. 33, pp. 61- 69 ,(2009) , 10.1007/S10979-008-9129-9
Richard Rogers, Jill E. Rogstad, Nathan D. Gillard, Eric Y. Drogin, Hayley L. Blackwood, Daniel W. Shuman, “Everyone knows their Miranda rights”: Implicit assumptions and countervailing evidence. Psychology, Public Policy and Law. ,vol. 16, pp. 300- 318 ,(2010) , 10.1037/A0019316
Kyle C. Scherr, Stephanie Madon, “Go ahead and sign”: An experimental examination of Miranda waivers and comprehension. Law and Human Behavior. ,vol. 37, pp. 208- 218 ,(2013) , 10.1037/LHB0000026
Elizabeth Stokoe, Derek Edwards, Helen Edwards, “No Comment” Responses to Questions in Police Investigative Interviews Discursive Constructions of Consent in the Legal Process. pp. 289- 317 ,(2016) , 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199945351.003.0013