Incidence and determinants of hysterectomy in a low-income setting in Gujarat, India

作者: Sapna Desai , Oona MR Campbell , Tara Sinha , Ajay Mahal , Simon Cousens

DOI: 10.1093/HEAPOL/CZW099

关键词: GynecologyReproductive healthMedicineFamily medicineSterilization (medicine)Family planningHealth policyHysterectomyHealth educationPsychological interventionDeveloping country

摘要: Hysterectomy is a leading reason for use of health insurance amongst low-income women in India, but there are limited population-level data available to inform policy. This paper reports on the findings mixed-methods study estimate incidence and identify predictors hysterectomy setting Gujarat, India. The estimated hysterectomy, 20.7/1000 woman- years (95% CI: 14.0, 30.8), was considerably higher than reported from other countries, at relatively low mean age 36 years. There strong evidence that among reproductive age, those with lower income least two children underwent rates. Nearly two-thirds undergoing utilized private hospitals, while remainder used government or non-profit facilities. Qualitative research suggested weak sexual services, widespread perception post-reproductive uterus dispensable lack knowledge side effects have resulted normalization hysterectomy. appears be promoted as first second-line treatment menstrual gynaecological disorders actually amenable less invasive procedures. Most sought medical opinions prior both public providers lacked equipment, skills motivation offer alternatives. Profit training benefits also appeared play role some providers' behaviour. Although insecure employment procedure knowing financial physical implications major surgery, future work security afforded by them outweigh risks. Findings suggest sterilization may associated an increased risk potentially through biological attitudinal links. Health policy interventions require improved access services education, along surveillance audits promote high-quality choices life cycle.

参考文章(81)
Sherry Weitzen, Christina A. Raker, Elisabeth A. Erekson, Deborah L. Myers, Vivian W. Sung, Socioeconomic Indicators and Hysterectomy Status in the United States, 2004 Journal of Reproductive Medicine. ,vol. 54, pp. 553- 558 ,(2009)
A Stankiewicz, L Pogany, C Popadiuk, Prevalence of self-reported hysterectomy among Canadian women, 2000/2001-2008. Chronic Diseases in Canada. ,vol. 34, pp. 30- 35 ,(2014) , 10.24095/HPCDP.34.1.05
Hussein J, Atwood Sj, Adolescent motherhood: priorities and next steps The Journal of family welfare. ,vol. 43, pp. 8- 14 ,(1997)
Iris Lopez, Agency And Constraint: Sterilization And Reproductive Freedom Among Puerto Rican Women In New York City Urban Anthropology and Studies of Cultural Systems and World Economic Development. ,vol. 22, pp. 299- 323 ,(1993)
Andreas Stang, Ray M. Merrill, Oliver Kuss, Hysterectomy in Germany Deutsches Aerzteblatt Online. ,vol. 108, pp. 508- 514 ,(2011) , 10.3238/ARZTEBL.2011.0508
Biosocial determinants of hysterectomy in New Zealand. American Journal of Public Health. ,vol. 90, pp. 1455- 1458 ,(2000) , 10.2105/AJPH.90.9.1455
Farouk M. N. Shakhatreh, Epidemiology of urinary incontinence in Jordanian women. Saudi Medical Journal. ,vol. 26, pp. 830- 835 ,(2005)
Nilangi Sardeshpande, Why do young women accept hysterectomy? Findings from a study in Maharashtra, India International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies. ,vol. 8, pp. 579- 585 ,(2014)