Optimized distance-dependent atom-pair-based potential DOOP for protein structure prediction.

作者: Myong-Ho Chae , Florian Krull , Ernst-Walter Knapp

DOI: 10.1002/PROT.24782

关键词: Computational chemistryProtein secondary structureDecoyEnergy landscapeProtein structure predictionProtein foldingChemistryProtein structureMolecular Docking SimulationBiological systemDocking (molecular)

摘要: The DOcking decoy-based Optimized Potential (DOOP) energy function for protein structure prediction is based on empirical distance-dependent atom-pair interactions. To optimize the interactions, native structures are decomposed into polypeptide chain segments that correspond to structural motives involving complete secondary elements. They constitute near ligand-receptor systems (or just pairs). Thus, a total of 8609 were prepared from 954 selected proteins. For each these hypothetical systems, 1000 evenly sampled docking decoys with 0-10 A interface root-mean-square-deviation (iRMSD) generated method used before protein-protein docking. neural network-based optimization was applied derive optimized parameters using so mimics funnel-like landscape interaction between systems. our hierarchically models overall structures. resulting tested several commonly decoy sets recognition and compared other statistical potentials. In combination torsion potential term which describes local conformational preference, atom-pair-based outperforms reported functions in correct ranking variety sets. This especially case most challenging ROSETTA set, although it does not take account side orientation-dependence explicitly. DOOP prediction, underlying database their freely available at http://agknapp.chemie.fu-berlin.de/doop/.

参考文章(49)
Mingyang Lu, Athanasios D. Dousis, Jianpeng Ma, OPUS-PSP: an orientation-dependent statistical all-atom potential derived from side-chain packing. Journal of Molecular Biology. ,vol. 376, pp. 288- 301 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.JMB.2007.11.033
Dmitry Rykunov, Andras Fiser, New statistical potential for quality assessment of protein models and a survey of energy functions BMC Bioinformatics. ,vol. 11, pp. 128- 128 ,(2010) , 10.1186/1471-2105-11-128
Bino John, Andrej Sali, Comparative protein structure modeling by iterative alignment, model building and model assessment Nucleic Acids Research. ,vol. 31, pp. 3982- 3992 ,(2003) , 10.1093/NAR/GKG460
George A Khoury, Adam Liwo, Firas Khatib, Hongyi Zhou, Gaurav Chopra, Jaume Bacardit, Leandro O Bortot, Rodrigo A Faccioli, Xin Deng, Yi He, Pawel Krupa, Jilong Li, Magdalena A Mozolewska, Adam K Sieradzan, James Smadbeck, Tomasz Wirecki, Seth Cooper, Jeff Flatten, Kefan Xu, David Baker, Jianlin Cheng, Alexandre CB Delbem, Christodoulos A Floudas, Chen Keasar, Michael Levitt, Zoran Popović, Harold A Scheraga, Jeffrey Skolnick, Silvia N Crivelli, Foldit Players, None, WeFold: a coopetition for protein structure prediction. Proteins. ,vol. 82, pp. 1850- 1868 ,(2014) , 10.1002/PROT.24538
Yang Zhang, Progress and challenges in protein structure prediction. Current Opinion in Structural Biology. ,vol. 18, pp. 342- 348 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.SBI.2008.02.004
Pascal Benkert, Silvio C. E. Tosatto, Dietmar Schomburg, QMEAN: A comprehensive scoring function for model quality assessment. Proteins. ,vol. 71, pp. 261- 277 ,(2008) , 10.1002/PROT.21715
Andrzej Kolinski, Piotr Rotkiewicz, Bartosz Ilkowski, Jeffrey Skolnick, A method for the improvement of threading-based protein models. Proteins. ,vol. 37, pp. 592- 610 ,(1999) , 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19991201)37:4<592::AID-PROT10>3.0.CO;2-2