Areas on which to focus when seeking to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions of commercial waste management. A case study of a hypermarket, Finland.

作者: M. Hupponen , K. Grönman , M. Horttanainen

DOI: 10.1016/J.WASMAN.2018.03.024

关键词: Waste treatmentCommercial wasteMunicipal solid wasteMixed wasteEnvironmental scienceWaste managementLife-cycle assessmentGreenhouse gasIncinerationFossil fuel

摘要: Abstract This study focuses on commercial waste, which has received less attention than household waste in regards to greenhouse gas emission research. First, the global warming potential (GWP) of management was calculated. Second, impacts different fractions and processes were recognised. Third, key areas focus when aiming reduce emissions determined. conducted generated by a real hypermarket South-East Finland included eight fractions. The treatment plants selected based actual situation. Three scenarios employed evaluate environmental impact managing mixed waste: landfilling, combustion more accurate source separation. GaBi software assessment methodology CML 2001 used perform life cycle associated with management. results indicated that total GWP could be reduced 93% directing instead landfill. A further 5% reduction achieved separation waste. Utilisation energy had most significant influence (41–52%) (−880 −860 kgCO2-eq./t), followed landfilling (influence 15–23% GWP, 430 kgCO2-eq./t), recycling polyethylene (PE) plastic 18–21% −1800 kgCO2-eq./t) cardboard 11–13% 51 kgCO2-eq./t). should placed substitutions, especially terms substitutions PE plastic. also clarified importance sorting plastic, even though share this fraction not substantial. paper compared those previous studies. output analysis can significantly identifying an alternative or incineration location for where it is substitute virgin material replace fossil fuels respectively. In conclusion, essential note companies have notable because they choose places at are treated utilised.

参考文章(35)
Åsa Davidsson, Christopher Gruvberger, Thomas H. Christensen, Trine Lund Hansen, Jes la Cour Jansen, Methane yield in source-sorted organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Waste Management. ,vol. 27, pp. 406- 414 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.WASMAN.2006.02.013
Jeffrey P. Chanton, David K. Powelson, Roger B. Green, Methane Oxidation in Landfill Cover Soils, is a 10% Default Value Reasonable? Journal of Environmental Quality. ,vol. 38, pp. 654- 663 ,(2009) , 10.2134/JEQ2008.0221
Chalita Liamsanguan, Shabbir H. Gheewala, LCA: A DECISION SUPPORT TOOL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF MSW MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS Journal of Environmental Management. ,vol. 87, pp. 132- 138 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2007.01.003
Julia Kaazke, Montse Meneses, Berndt-Michael Wilke, Vera Susanne Rotter, Environmental evaluation of waste treatment scenarios for the towns Khanty-Mansiysk and Surgut, Russia: Waste Management & Research. ,vol. 31, pp. 315- 326 ,(2013) , 10.1177/0734242X12473792
Hanna Merrild, Anders Damgaard, Thomas H. Christensen, Life cycle assessment of waste paper management: The importance of technology data and system boundaries in assessing recycling and incineration Resources Conservation and Recycling. ,vol. 52, pp. 1391- 1398 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2008.08.004
Adriana Del Borghi, Michela Gallo, Marco Del Borghi, A survey of life cycle approaches in waste management International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 14, pp. 597- 610 ,(2009) , 10.1007/S11367-009-0111-7
Francesco Cherubini, Silvia Bargigli, Sergio Ulgiati, Life cycle assessment (LCA) of waste management strategies: Landfilling, sorting plant and incineration Energy. ,vol. 34, pp. 2116- 2123 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.ENERGY.2008.08.023
Ivan T. Herrmann, Andreas Moltesen, Does it matter which Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) tool you choose? – a comparative assessment of SimaPro and GaBi Journal of Cleaner Production. ,vol. 86, pp. 163- 169 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2014.08.004