Anamnemic subjectivity: new steps toward a hermeneutics of memory

作者: Hans Ruin

DOI: 10.1007/S11007-015-9323-7

关键词: SociologySubjectivityCultural memoryPhenomenology (philosophy)TemporalityPolitical philosophyEpistemologyHermeneutics

摘要: The topic and theme of memory has occupied an ambiguous position in phenomenological hermeneutic thinking from the start, at once central marginalized. Parallel to partly following upon general turn toward collective cultural human social sciences over last decades, importance for theory begun emerge more clearly. article seeks untangle reasons this theme. It describes how why question what is can provide a unique entrance temporality historicity existence, while same time it also block access precisely these most fundamental levels subjectivity. text argues deeper mutual theoretical engagement between phenomenological–hermeneutical contemporary studies, on basis understanding as finite ec-static temporality, enigma so-called anamnetic

参考文章(28)
Hans Ruin, Blinding Wisdom – Nietzsche’s Superhistorical Gaze Södertörns högskola. pp. 123- 142 ,(2005)
Maurice Halbwachs, On Collective Memory ,(1992)
Lucette Valensi, Nathan Wachtel, Marie Noelle Bourguet, Between Memory and History ,(1991)
Jan Assmann, Tonio Hölscher, Kultur und Gedächtnis Suhrkamp. ,(1988)
Angelica Nuzzo, Memory, History, Justice in Hegel ,(2012)
Aristotle, David Bloch, On memory and recollection Brill. ,(2007)
Astrid Erll, Ansgar Nünning, Sara B. Young, Cultural memory studies : an international and interdisciplinary handbook de Gruyter. ,(2008)