Comments on the Recent Clinical Guidance Statement on HIV Screening

作者: David R Holtgrave , None

DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00016

关键词: Cost–benefit analysisTest (assessment)PsychosocialFamily medicineDistressGuidelineMEDLINEPsychiatryHealth careIntervention (counseling)MedicineInternal medicineGeneral Medicine

摘要: Although we agree in principle with the guidelines setforth by Qaseem and colleagues (1) regarding HIV screening havegenerally adopted similar practices our clinics, are concerned thatsome consequences of universal were not addressed thisarticle. Specifically, assuming sensitivity specificity to be greaterthan 99% greater than 99.99%, respectively, for sequentialscreening test (initial enzyme immunoassay followed either confirma-tory Western blot or immunofluorescent assay) U.S. populationestimate number persons older 13 years 244 926 386persons (2), then applying sequential this popula-tion would result 24 393 false-positive results. This is anunfortunate consequence screening, no mention ismade cost misdiagnosis, which could involve unnecessary med-ical intervention squandering limited health care resources (3).In addition, results may develop se-vere psychosocial distress (4) unable obtain insur-ance. These cases substantial financial healthcare system respect litigation (5). Furthermore, many thou-sands positive on initial immuno-assay before testing negative a confirmatory test, wouldresult stress these as well. Therefore, al-though broader approaches warranted, medical practi-tioners who initiate must educated poten-tial future guideline statements areconstructed screening.

参考文章(13)
Patricio Escalante, Tuberculosis Annals of Internal Medicine. ,vol. 150, pp. ITC6- 1 ,(2009) , 10.7326/0003-4819-150-11-200906020-01006
Rahul Bhattacharya, Simon Barton, Jose Catalan, When good news is bad news: psychological impact of false positive diagnosis of HIV Aids Care-psychological and Socio-medical Aspects of Aids\/hiv. ,vol. 20, pp. 560- 564 ,(2008) , 10.1080/09540120701867206
David R. Holtgrave, When "heightened" means "lessened": the case of HIV prevention resources in the United States. Journal of Urban Health-bulletin of The New York Academy of Medicine. ,vol. 84, pp. 648- 652 ,(2007) , 10.1007/S11524-007-9203-5
David A Grimes, Kenneth F Schulz, Uses and abuses of screening tests. The Lancet. ,vol. 359, pp. 881- 884 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07948-5
A. David Paltiel, Milton C. Weinstein, April D. Kimmel, George R. Seage, Elena Losina, Hong Zhang, Kenneth A. Freedberg, Rochelle P. Walensky, Expanded screening for HIV in the United States--an analysis of cost-effectiveness. The New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 352, pp. 586- 595 ,(2005) , 10.1056/NEJMSA042088
Gillian D Sanders, Ahmed M Bayoumi, Mark Holodniy, Douglas K Owens, Cost-Effectiveness of HIV Screening in Patients Older than 55 Years of Age Annals of Internal Medicine. ,vol. 148, pp. 889- 903 ,(2008) , 10.7326/0003-4819-148-12-200806170-00002
Rochelle P. Walensky, Milton C. Weinstein, April D. Kimmel, George R. Seage, Elena Losina, Paul E. Sax, Hong Zhang, Heather E. Smith, Kenneth A. Freedberg, A. David Paltiel, Routine human immunodeficiency virus testing: an economic evaluation of current guidelines. The American Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 118, pp. 292- 300 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.AMJMED.2004.07.055
Roger Chou, Laurie Hoyt Huffman, Rongwei Fu, Ariel K. Smits, P. Todd Korthuis, Prenatal Screening for HIV: A Review of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Annals of Internal Medicine. ,vol. 143, pp. 38- 54 ,(2005) , 10.7326/0003-4819-143-1-200507050-00010